Rubber — Import Quantity in Philippines
Philippines: Rubber — Import Quantity was 103 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Rubber — Import Quantity in Philippines, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
In 2013, rubber — import quantity in Philippines stood at 103 t.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 90.7% on the previous year and down 96.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rubber — import quantity in Philippines peaked at 11,766 t in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1961.
Philippines ranks 89th of 149 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rubber — Import Quantity in Philippines, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t | — |
| 1962 | 0 t | — |
| 1963 | 0 t | — |
| 1964 | 0 t | — |
| 1965 | 0 t | — |
| 1966 | 0 t | — |
| 1967 | 0 t | — |
| 1968 | 0 t | — |
| 1969 | 0 t | — |
| 1970 | 0 t | — |
| 1971 | 0 t | — |
| 1972 | 0 t | — |
| 1973 | 0 t | — |
| 1974 | 0 t | — |
| 1975 | 0 t | — |
| 1976 | 0 t | — |
| 1977 | 27 t | — |
| 1978 | 23 t | -14.8% |
| 1979 | 665 t | +2791.3% |
| 1980 | 51 t | -92.3% |
| 1981 | 99 t | +94.1% |
| 1982 | 158 t | +59.6% |
| 1983 | 508 t | +221.5% |
| 1984 | 20 t | -96.1% |
| 1985 | 27 t | +35.0% |
| 1986 | 197 t | +629.6% |
| 1987 | 90 t | -54.3% |
| 1988 | 276 t | +206.7% |
| 1989 | 491 t | +77.9% |
| 1990 | 97 t | -80.2% |
| 1991 | 220 t | +126.8% |
| 1992 | 488 t | +121.8% |
| 1993 | 533 t | +9.2% |
| 1994 | 593 t | +11.3% |
| 1995 | 425 t | -28.3% |
| 1996 | 613 t | +44.2% |
| 1997 | 749 t | +22.2% |
| 1998 | 704 t | -6.0% |
| 1999 | 566 t | -19.6% |
| 2000 | 636 t | +12.4% |
| 2001 | 989 t | +55.5% |
| 2002 | 697 t | -29.5% |
| 2003 | 3,283 t | +371.0% |
| 2004 | 998 t | -69.6% |
| 2005 | 3,476 t | +248.3% |
| 2006 | 8,901 t | +156.1% |
| 2007 | 9,400 t | +5.6% |
| 2008 | 11,766 t | +25.2% |
| 2009 | 4,156 t | -64.7% |
| 2010 | 122 t | -97.1% |
| 2011 | 128 t | +4.9% |
| 2012 | 54 t | -57.8% |
| 2013 | 103 t | +90.7% |
Philippines compared with similar countries
- Philippines's 103 t is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 106.5 t, 97% of the median. (38 countries reporting)
- Philippines's 103 t is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 66 t, 1.6× the median. (14 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Rubber — Import Quantity in Philippines changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1979 | +2791.3% | 23 t | 665 t |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 71.5 t | 0 t | 665 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 191.7 t | 20 t | 508 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 498.8 t | 97 t | 749 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 4,430 t | 636 t | 11,766 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 101.75 t | 54 t | 128 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
More agriculture & rural data for Philippines
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -0.2488 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0859 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 358.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.0874 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4423 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 8.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 8.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.6% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rubber — import quantity in Philippines?
- Rubber — import quantity in Philippines was 103 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest rubber — import quantity recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 11,766 t in 2008.
- What is the lowest rubber — import quantity recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1961.
- How does Philippines rank for rubber — import quantity?
- Philippines ranks 89th out of 149 countries with data for 2013.
- Is rubber — import quantity rising or falling in Philippines?
- Over the last ten years it is down 96.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Rubber — Import Quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.