Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia
Latvia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia, 1995–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Latvia recorded 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 30 years on record.
The figure is down 13.9% on the previous year and down 82.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia peaked at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, in 2024.
Latvia ranks 107th of 139 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia, year by year
| Year | 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +21.1% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -20.1% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -33.2% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +9.1% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -11.4% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -22.0% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +10.6% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -20.9% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -30.8% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -33.2% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -19.0% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +3.7% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +5.8% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -14.4% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +13.0% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -23.4% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -57.5% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +14.5% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -19.7% |
| 2021 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -44.4% |
| 2022 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +13.8% |
| 2023 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +0.5% |
| 2024 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -13.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More agriculture & rural data for Latvia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,055 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3137 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.1% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 1996.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- How does Latvia rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Latvia ranks 107th out of 139 countries with data for 2024.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 82.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 30 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.