Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Central African Republic
Central African Republic: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Central African Republic, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 USD per square kilometre.
Analysis
Central African Republic recorded 1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in 2023.
That represents a change of up 2.5% on the previous year and up 17.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Central African Republic peaked at 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0.6042 1000 USD per square kilometre, in 1995.
That places Central African Republic 76th out of 139 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Central African Republic, year by year
| Year | 1000 USD per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.7027 1000 USD per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.6427 1000 USD per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 1963 | 0.643 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1964 | 0.6262 1000 USD per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1965 | 0.7553 1000 USD per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 1966 | 0.6151 1000 USD per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1967 | 0.6501 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1968 | 0.6856 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1969 | 0.7167 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1970 | 0.762 1000 USD per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1971 | 0.8108 1000 USD per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1972 | 0.8602 1000 USD per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1973 | 0.9221 1000 USD per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1974 | 0.8909 1000 USD per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1975 | 0.8497 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1976 | 0.8752 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1977 | 0.9104 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1978 | 0.9425 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1979 | 0.9343 1000 USD per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1980 | 0.9172 1000 USD per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1981 | 0.9084 1000 USD per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1982 | 0.8654 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1983 | 0.7964 1000 USD per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1984 | 0.7318 1000 USD per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1985 | 0.667 1000 USD per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1986 | 0.6734 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1987 | 0.607 1000 USD per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1988 | 0.619 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1989 | 0.6134 1000 USD per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1990 | 0.665 1000 USD per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1991 | 0.6816 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1992 | 0.68 1000 USD per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1993 | 0.6758 1000 USD per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1994 | 0.6264 1000 USD per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1995 | 0.6042 1000 USD per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1996 | 0.6339 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1997 | 0.6792 1000 USD per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1998 | 0.7041 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1999 | 0.6624 1000 USD per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2000 | 0.6637 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2001 | 0.6649 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2002 | 0.6661 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2003 | 0.6673 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2004 | 0.6686 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2005 | 0.6811 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2006 | 0.6762 1000 USD per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2007 | 0.6988 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2008 | 0.7199 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2009 | 0.7385 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2010 | 1.5 1000 USD per square kilometre | +103.7% |
| 2011 | 1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 2012 | 1.43 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2013 | 0.988 1000 USD per square kilometre | -31.0% |
| 2014 | 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2015 | 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2016 | 1.43 1000 USD per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 2017 | 1.45 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2018 | 1.5 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2019 | 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2020 | 1.08 1000 USD per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 2021 | 1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2022 | 1.13 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2023 | 1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.5% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Central African Republic changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | +103.7% | 0.7385 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.5 1000 USD per square kilometre |
| 2016 | +37.2% | 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.43 1000 USD per square kilometre |
| 2013 | -31.0% | 1.43 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.988 1000 USD per square kilometre |
| 2020 | -30.4% | 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.08 1000 USD per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6708 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.6151 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.7553 1000 USD per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.8758 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.762 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.9425 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.7399 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.607 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.9172 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6613 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.6042 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.7041 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.6845 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.6637 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.7385 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.33 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.988 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.12 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.08 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Central African Republic
- 73 Guinea 1.33 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 74 Austria 1.28 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 75 Colombia 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 77 Zimbabwe 1.15 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 78 Panama 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 79 Spain 1.07 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Central African Republic
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.27 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2761 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 153.53 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 2.63 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.5545 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 27.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 27.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 5.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Central African Republic?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Central African Republic was 1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Central African Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2019.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Central African Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.6042 1000 USD per square kilometre in 1995.
- How does Central African Republic rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Central African Republic ranks 76th out of 139 countries with data for 2023.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Central African Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Central African Republic data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.