Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Uruguay
Uruguay: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value was 3.04 million 1000 SLC in 2024. ▼ Falling
Latest (2024)
3.04 million 1000 SLC
Change on year
down 1.2%
World rank
71st
of 149 countries
All-time high
5.45 million 1000 SLC
in 1991
All-time low
2.09 million 1000 SLC
in 1968
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Uruguay, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 SLC.
Analysis
Uruguay recorded 3.04 million 1000 SLC for roots and tubers, total — gross production value in 2024.
That represents a change of down 1.2% on the previous year and down 6.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Uruguay peaked at 5.45 million 1000 SLC in 1991 and was at its lowest, 2.09 million 1000 SLC, in 1968.
That places Uruguay 71st out of 149 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | 1000 SLC | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 4.25 million 1000 SLC | — |
| 1962 | 2.98 million 1000 SLC | -30.0% |
| 1963 | 4.19 million 1000 SLC | +40.8% |
| 1964 | 3.70 million 1000 SLC | -11.7% |
| 1965 | 3.89 million 1000 SLC | +5.2% |
| 1966 | 4.65 million 1000 SLC | +19.5% |
| 1967 | 3.64 million 1000 SLC | -21.8% |
| 1968 | 2.09 million 1000 SLC | -42.6% |
| 1969 | 4.44 million 1000 SLC | +112.3% |
| 1970 | 4.10 million 1000 SLC | -7.5% |
| 1971 | 4.92 million 1000 SLC | +20.0% |
| 1972 | 3.60 million 1000 SLC | -26.9% |
| 1973 | 4.32 million 1000 SLC | +20.1% |
| 1974 | 4.36 million 1000 SLC | +0.8% |
| 1975 | 4.16 million 1000 SLC | -4.4% |
| 1976 | 4.78 million 1000 SLC | +14.8% |
| 1977 | 3.59 million 1000 SLC | -25.0% |
| 1978 | 3.39 million 1000 SLC | -5.3% |
| 1979 | 4.12 million 1000 SLC | +21.3% |
| 1980 | 3.33 million 1000 SLC | -19.1% |
| 1981 | 5.02 million 1000 SLC | +50.6% |
| 1982 | 4.42 million 1000 SLC | -11.9% |
| 1983 | 3.55 million 1000 SLC | -19.7% |
| 1984 | 4.30 million 1000 SLC | +21.3% |
| 1985 | 4.73 million 1000 SLC | +9.9% |
| 1986 | 3.58 million 1000 SLC | -24.4% |
| 1987 | 3.92 million 1000 SLC | +9.7% |
| 1988 | 4.29 million 1000 SLC | +9.3% |
| 1989 | 3.96 million 1000 SLC | -7.6% |
| 1990 | 4.29 million 1000 SLC | +8.3% |
| 1991 | 5.45 million 1000 SLC | +27.1% |
| 1992 | 4.35 million 1000 SLC | -20.1% |
| 1993 | 4.31 million 1000 SLC | -1.1% |
| 1994 | 3.59 million 1000 SLC | -16.6% |
| 1995 | 3.62 million 1000 SLC | +0.9% |
| 1996 | 3.73 million 1000 SLC | +2.9% |
| 1997 | 3.79 million 1000 SLC | +1.7% |
| 1998 | 4.23 million 1000 SLC | +11.5% |
| 1999 | 4.64 million 1000 SLC | +9.7% |
| 2000 | 3.57 million 1000 SLC | -23.1% |
| 2001 | 3.86 million 1000 SLC | +8.2% |
| 2002 | 4.31 million 1000 SLC | +11.6% |
| 2003 | 5.05 million 1000 SLC | +17.2% |
| 2004 | 4.17 million 1000 SLC | -17.4% |
| 2005 | 4.72 million 1000 SLC | +13.1% |
| 2006 | 4.55 million 1000 SLC | -3.7% |
| 2007 | 3.94 million 1000 SLC | -13.4% |
| 2008 | 3.70 million 1000 SLC | -6.1% |
| 2009 | 3.63 million 1000 SLC | -2.0% |
| 2010 | 3.91 million 1000 SLC | +7.7% |
| 2011 | 3.40 million 1000 SLC | -13.0% |
| 2012 | 3.84 million 1000 SLC | +13.0% |
| 2013 | 3.43 million 1000 SLC | -10.6% |
| 2014 | 3.25 million 1000 SLC | -5.2% |
| 2015 | 3.07 million 1000 SLC | -5.6% |
| 2016 | 3.46 million 1000 SLC | +12.6% |
| 2017 | 3.60 million 1000 SLC | +4.0% |
| 2018 | 3.46 million 1000 SLC | -3.9% |
| 2019 | 3.64 million 1000 SLC | +5.4% |
| 2020 | 3.21 million 1000 SLC | -11.8% |
| 2021 | 3.61 million 1000 SLC | +12.5% |
| 2022 | 3.57 million 1000 SLC | -1.1% |
| 2023 | 3.07 million 1000 SLC | -14.0% |
| 2024 | 3.04 million 1000 SLC | -1.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.76 million 1000 SLC | 2.09 million 1000 SLC | 4.65 million 1000 SLC | 9 |
| 1970s | 4.13 million 1000 SLC | 3.39 million 1000 SLC | 4.92 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.11 million 1000 SLC | 3.33 million 1000 SLC | 5.02 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.20 million 1000 SLC | 3.59 million 1000 SLC | 5.45 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.15 million 1000 SLC | 3.57 million 1000 SLC | 5.05 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.51 million 1000 SLC | 3.07 million 1000 SLC | 3.91 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.30 million 1000 SLC | 3.04 million 1000 SLC | 3.61 million 1000 SLC | 5 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
More agriculture & rural data for Uruguay
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 3.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0638 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,609 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.0435 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 14.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Uruguay?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Uruguay was 3.04 million 1000 SLC in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 5.45 million 1000 SLC in 1991.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.09 million 1000 SLC in 1968.
- How does Uruguay rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value?
- Uruguay ranks 71st out of 149 countries with data for 2024.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.