Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Ecuador
Ecuador: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value was 104,010 1000 SLC in 2024. ▼ Falling
Latest (2024)
104,010 1000 SLC
Change on year
down 18.4%
World rank
113th
of 149 countries
All-time high
342,167 1000 SLC
in 1971
All-time low
99,563 1000 SLC
in 1991
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Ecuador, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 SLC.
Analysis
In 2024, roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Ecuador stood at 104,010 1000 SLC.
That represents a change of down 18.4% on the previous year and down 41.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Ecuador peaked at 342,167 1000 SLC in 1971 and was at its lowest, 99,563 1000 SLC, in 1991.
That places Ecuador 113th out of 149 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 1000 SLC | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 160,917 1000 SLC | — |
| 1962 | 170,391 1000 SLC | +5.9% |
| 1963 | 158,001 1000 SLC | -7.3% |
| 1964 | 168,594 1000 SLC | +6.7% |
| 1965 | 209,488 1000 SLC | +24.3% |
| 1966 | 198,808 1000 SLC | -5.1% |
| 1967 | 229,644 1000 SLC | +15.5% |
| 1968 | 243,324 1000 SLC | +6.0% |
| 1969 | 269,145 1000 SLC | +10.6% |
| 1970 | 292,598 1000 SLC | +8.7% |
| 1971 | 342,167 1000 SLC | +16.9% |
| 1972 | 270,611 1000 SLC | -20.9% |
| 1973 | 286,410 1000 SLC | +5.8% |
| 1974 | 294,337 1000 SLC | +2.8% |
| 1975 | 274,577 1000 SLC | -6.7% |
| 1976 | 274,208 1000 SLC | -0.1% |
| 1977 | 208,914 1000 SLC | -23.8% |
| 1978 | 167,867 1000 SLC | -19.6% |
| 1979 | 139,715 1000 SLC | -16.8% |
| 1980 | 175,531 1000 SLC | +25.6% |
| 1981 | 201,237 1000 SLC | +14.6% |
| 1982 | 197,692 1000 SLC | -1.8% |
| 1983 | 167,216 1000 SLC | -15.4% |
| 1984 | 205,399 1000 SLC | +22.8% |
| 1985 | 210,567 1000 SLC | +2.5% |
| 1986 | 168,322 1000 SLC | -20.1% |
| 1987 | 160,545 1000 SLC | -4.6% |
| 1988 | 153,496 1000 SLC | -4.4% |
| 1989 | 159,928 1000 SLC | +4.2% |
| 1990 | 166,626 1000 SLC | +4.2% |
| 1991 | 99,563 1000 SLC | -40.2% |
| 1992 | 191,513 1000 SLC | +92.4% |
| 1993 | 168,031 1000 SLC | -12.3% |
| 1994 | 204,191 1000 SLC | +21.5% |
| 1995 | 183,283 1000 SLC | -10.2% |
| 1996 | 209,063 1000 SLC | +14.1% |
| 1997 | 222,214 1000 SLC | +6.3% |
| 1998 | 203,039 1000 SLC | -8.6% |
| 1999 | 214,664 1000 SLC | +5.7% |
| 2000 | 106,125 1000 SLC | -50.6% |
| 2001 | 174,380 1000 SLC | +64.3% |
| 2002 | 115,190 1000 SLC | -33.9% |
| 2003 | 154,372 1000 SLC | +34.0% |
| 2004 | 166,644 1000 SLC | +7.9% |
| 2005 | 145,624 1000 SLC | -12.6% |
| 2006 | 144,346 1000 SLC | -0.9% |
| 2007 | 131,340 1000 SLC | -9.0% |
| 2008 | 122,375 1000 SLC | -6.8% |
| 2009 | 119,306 1000 SLC | -2.5% |
| 2010 | 150,395 1000 SLC | +26.1% |
| 2011 | 134,378 1000 SLC | -10.6% |
| 2012 | 121,197 1000 SLC | -9.8% |
| 2013 | 134,972 1000 SLC | +11.4% |
| 2014 | 178,759 1000 SLC | +32.4% |
| 2015 | 161,205 1000 SLC | -9.8% |
| 2016 | 173,741 1000 SLC | +7.8% |
| 2017 | 161,794 1000 SLC | -6.9% |
| 2018 | 118,065 1000 SLC | -27.0% |
| 2019 | 118,282 1000 SLC | +0.2% |
| 2020 | 161,897 1000 SLC | +36.9% |
| 2021 | 115,174 1000 SLC | -28.9% |
| 2022 | 131,358 1000 SLC | +14.1% |
| 2023 | 127,504 1000 SLC | -2.9% |
| 2024 | 104,010 1000 SLC | -18.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 200,924 1000 SLC | 158,001 1000 SLC | 269,145 1000 SLC | 9 |
| 1970s | 255,140 1000 SLC | 139,715 1000 SLC | 342,167 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1980s | 179,993 1000 SLC | 153,496 1000 SLC | 210,567 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1990s | 186,219 1000 SLC | 99,563 1000 SLC | 222,214 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2000s | 137,970 1000 SLC | 106,125 1000 SLC | 174,380 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2010s | 145,279 1000 SLC | 118,065 1000 SLC | 178,759 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2020s | 127,989 1000 SLC | 104,010 1000 SLC | 161,897 1000 SLC | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Ecuador?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Ecuador was 104,010 1000 SLC in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 342,167 1000 SLC in 1971.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 99,563 1000 SLC in 1991.
- How does Ecuador rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value?
- Ecuador ranks 113th out of 149 countries with data for 2024.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 41.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.