Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Namibia
Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value was 86,305 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
86,305 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 0.3%
World rank
104th
of 192 countries
All-time high
87,308 1000 Int$
in 2020
All-time low
30,509 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Namibia, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Namibia is 86,305 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 0.3% on the previous year and up 7.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Namibia peaked at 87,308 1000 Int$ in 2020 and was at its lowest, 30,509 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places Namibia 104th out of 192 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Namibia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 30,509 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 32,688 1000 Int$ | +7.1% |
| 1963 | 33,124 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1964 | 34,867 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1965 | 35,303 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1966 | 35,521 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1967 | 35,957 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1968 | 35,957 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 36,611 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1970 | 36,828 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1971 | 37,046 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1972 | 37,264 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1973 | 38,136 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1974 | 38,136 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 38,790 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 1976 | 38,790 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 39,226 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1978 | 39,661 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1979 | 40,097 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1980 | 40,097 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 40,969 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 1982 | 41,405 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1983 | 42,059 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1984 | 43,148 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1985 | 43,584 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1986 | 44,020 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1987 | 44,891 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1988 | 45,763 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1989 | 45,763 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 46,199 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1991 | 46,853 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1992 | 42,494 1000 Int$ | -9.3% |
| 1993 | 43,584 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1994 | 45,763 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1995 | 47,942 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1996 | 50,122 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1997 | 52,301 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 1998 | 53,390 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1999 | 54,480 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2000 | 55,820 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 2001 | 59,339 1000 Int$ | +6.3% |
| 2002 | 62,858 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 2003 | 65,287 1000 Int$ | +3.9% |
| 2004 | 67,517 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 2005 | 69,946 1000 Int$ | +3.6% |
| 2006 | 70,678 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 2007 | 74,121 1000 Int$ | +4.9% |
| 2008 | 72,560 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 2009 | 71,682 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 2010 | 74,800 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 2011 | 75,981 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2012 | 76,996 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 2013 | 79,308 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 2014 | 80,527 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 2015 | 82,045 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2016 | 82,495 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2017 | 83,510 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2018 | 84,692 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2019 | 85,900 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2020 | 87,308 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2021 | 85,967 1000 Int$ | -1.5% |
| 2022 | 86,392 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2023 | 86,555 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2024 | 86,305 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 34,504 1000 Int$ | 30,509 1000 Int$ | 36,611 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 38,397 1000 Int$ | 36,828 1000 Int$ | 40,097 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 43,170 1000 Int$ | 40,097 1000 Int$ | 45,763 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 48,313 1000 Int$ | 42,494 1000 Int$ | 54,480 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 66,981 1000 Int$ | 55,820 1000 Int$ | 74,121 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 80,625 1000 Int$ | 74,800 1000 Int$ | 85,900 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 86,505 1000 Int$ | 85,967 1000 Int$ | 87,308 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Namibia
More agriculture & rural data for Namibia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 8 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0699 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 340.78 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4913 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 7.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 7.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.5% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Namibia?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Namibia was 86,305 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in Namibia?
- The highest recorded value was 87,308 1000 Int$ in 2020.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in Namibia?
- The lowest recorded value was 30,509 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Namibia rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value?
- Namibia ranks 104th out of 192 countries with data for 2024.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value rising or falling in Namibia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Namibia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.