Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production Value … I constant in Eswatini
Eswatini: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production Value … I constant was 17,234 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Eswatini, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Eswatini recorded 17,234 1000 Int$ for roots and tubers, total — gross production value in 2024.
That represents a change of up 0.2% on the previous year and up 8.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Eswatini peaked at 17,518 1000 Int$ in 2019 and was at its lowest, 5,363 1000 Int$, in 1962.
Eswatini ranks 189th of 252 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production Value … I constant in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 5,418 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 5,363 1000 Int$ | -1.0% |
| 1963 | 5,502 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1964 | 5,663 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 1965 | 5,667 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1966 | 5,964 1000 Int$ | +5.2% |
| 1967 | 6,009 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 1968 | 6,311 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1969 | 6,690 1000 Int$ | +6.0% |
| 1970 | 6,868 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1971 | 7,595 1000 Int$ | +10.6% |
| 1972 | 7,278 1000 Int$ | -4.2% |
| 1973 | 7,010 1000 Int$ | -3.7% |
| 1974 | 7,570 1000 Int$ | +8.0% |
| 1975 | 7,110 1000 Int$ | -6.1% |
| 1976 | 9,461 1000 Int$ | +33.1% |
| 1977 | 7,489 1000 Int$ | -20.8% |
| 1978 | 8,701 1000 Int$ | +16.2% |
| 1979 | 9,060 1000 Int$ | +4.1% |
| 1980 | 8,860 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 1981 | 7,698 1000 Int$ | -13.1% |
| 1982 | 7,741 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1983 | 7,752 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1984 | 8,703 1000 Int$ | +12.3% |
| 1985 | 9,308 1000 Int$ | +7.0% |
| 1986 | 9,539 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 1987 | 9,748 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 1988 | 9,874 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1989 | 10,503 1000 Int$ | +6.4% |
| 1990 | 9,749 1000 Int$ | -7.2% |
| 1991 | 9,858 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1992 | 10,345 1000 Int$ | +4.9% |
| 1993 | 10,587 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1994 | 10,814 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1995 | 10,914 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 1996 | 11,046 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1997 | 11,305 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1998 | 11,514 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1999 | 11,440 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2000 | 11,792 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 2001 | 11,957 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2002 | 12,072 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 2003 | 12,218 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2004 | 12,250 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 2005 | 12,456 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 2006 | 12,001 1000 Int$ | -3.7% |
| 2007 | 12,631 1000 Int$ | +5.2% |
| 2008 | 13,431 1000 Int$ | +6.3% |
| 2009 | 14,061 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 2010 | 14,325 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2011 | 14,748 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 2012 | 15,335 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 2013 | 15,623 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2014 | 15,842 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2015 | 16,100 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2016 | 16,427 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2017 | 16,737 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2018 | 17,033 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2019 | 17,518 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 2020 | 17,125 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 2021 | 17,244 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2022 | 17,252 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 17,207 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2024 | 17,234 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production Value … I constant in Eswatini changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1976 | +33.1% | 7,110 1000 Int$ | 9,461 1000 Int$ |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,843 1000 Int$ | 5,363 1000 Int$ | 6,690 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 7,814 1000 Int$ | 6,868 1000 Int$ | 9,461 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 8,973 1000 Int$ | 7,698 1000 Int$ | 10,503 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 10,757 1000 Int$ | 9,749 1000 Int$ | 11,514 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 12,487 1000 Int$ | 11,792 1000 Int$ | 14,061 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 15,969 1000 Int$ | 14,325 1000 Int$ | 17,518 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 17,212 1000 Int$ | 17,125 1000 Int$ | 17,252 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
More agriculture & rural data for Eswatini
- Sheep — Stocks 18,522 An (2024)
- Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Yield/Carcass Weight 225 kg/An (2024)
- Wheat — Production 721.77 t (2024)
- Wheat — Yield 1,854 kg/ha (2024)
- Wheat — Area harvested 389 ha (2024)
- Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered 9,465 An (2024)
- Sheep fat, unrendered — Production 3.9 t (2024)
- Rice — Area harvested 368 ha (2024)
- Tomatoes — Yield 13,225 kg/ha (2024)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested 422 ha (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Eswatini?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Eswatini was 17,234 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 17,518 1000 Int$ in 2019.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 5,363 1000 Int$ in 1962.
- How does Eswatini rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value?
- Eswatini ranks 189th out of 252 countries with data for 2024.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.