Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Ecuador
Ecuador: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value was 74,376 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▼ Falling
Latest (2024)
74,376 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 17.0%
World rank
109th
of 192 countries
All-time high
231,348 1000 Int$
in 1971
All-time low
68,779 1000 Int$
in 1991
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Ecuador, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Ecuador is 74,376 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 17.0% on the previous year and down 41.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Ecuador peaked at 231,348 1000 Int$ in 1971 and was at its lowest, 68,779 1000 Int$, in 1991.
Ecuador ranks 109th of 192 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 106,593 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 114,087 1000 Int$ | +7.0% |
| 1963 | 105,323 1000 Int$ | -7.7% |
| 1964 | 114,346 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 1965 | 141,033 1000 Int$ | +23.3% |
| 1966 | 131,631 1000 Int$ | -6.7% |
| 1967 | 151,781 1000 Int$ | +15.3% |
| 1968 | 167,453 1000 Int$ | +10.3% |
| 1969 | 177,023 1000 Int$ | +5.7% |
| 1970 | 195,415 1000 Int$ | +10.4% |
| 1971 | 231,348 1000 Int$ | +18.4% |
| 1972 | 178,985 1000 Int$ | -22.6% |
| 1973 | 191,722 1000 Int$ | +7.1% |
| 1974 | 193,687 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1975 | 183,504 1000 Int$ | -5.3% |
| 1976 | 183,768 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1977 | 143,042 1000 Int$ | -22.2% |
| 1978 | 116,125 1000 Int$ | -18.8% |
| 1979 | 93,110 1000 Int$ | -19.8% |
| 1980 | 116,702 1000 Int$ | +25.3% |
| 1981 | 135,309 1000 Int$ | +15.9% |
| 1982 | 137,257 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1983 | 114,785 1000 Int$ | -16.4% |
| 1984 | 140,112 1000 Int$ | +22.1% |
| 1985 | 142,969 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1986 | 118,586 1000 Int$ | -17.1% |
| 1987 | 112,403 1000 Int$ | -5.2% |
| 1988 | 107,614 1000 Int$ | -4.3% |
| 1989 | 112,767 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1990 | 116,849 1000 Int$ | +3.6% |
| 1991 | 68,779 1000 Int$ | -41.1% |
| 1992 | 137,458 1000 Int$ | +99.9% |
| 1993 | 119,994 1000 Int$ | -12.7% |
| 1994 | 147,009 1000 Int$ | +22.5% |
| 1995 | 131,447 1000 Int$ | -10.6% |
| 1996 | 150,638 1000 Int$ | +14.6% |
| 1997 | 159,802 1000 Int$ | +6.1% |
| 1998 | 145,767 1000 Int$ | -8.8% |
| 1999 | 154,010 1000 Int$ | +5.7% |
| 2000 | 73,743 1000 Int$ | -52.1% |
| 2001 | 124,035 1000 Int$ | +68.2% |
| 2002 | 79,620 1000 Int$ | -35.8% |
| 2003 | 108,952 1000 Int$ | +36.8% |
| 2004 | 118,267 1000 Int$ | +8.5% |
| 2005 | 102,420 1000 Int$ | -13.4% |
| 2006 | 103,395 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 2007 | 93,780 1000 Int$ | -9.3% |
| 2008 | 85,671 1000 Int$ | -8.6% |
| 2009 | 85,638 1000 Int$ | -0.0% |
| 2010 | 109,691 1000 Int$ | +28.1% |
| 2011 | 98,527 1000 Int$ | -10.2% |
| 2012 | 87,523 1000 Int$ | -11.2% |
| 2013 | 99,213 1000 Int$ | +13.4% |
| 2014 | 127,646 1000 Int$ | +28.7% |
| 2015 | 117,112 1000 Int$ | -8.3% |
| 2016 | 125,241 1000 Int$ | +6.9% |
| 2017 | 115,836 1000 Int$ | -7.5% |
| 2018 | 85,162 1000 Int$ | -26.5% |
| 2019 | 85,771 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2020 | 118,263 1000 Int$ | +37.9% |
| 2021 | 81,919 1000 Int$ | -30.7% |
| 2022 | 90,893 1000 Int$ | +11.0% |
| 2023 | 89,644 1000 Int$ | -1.4% |
| 2024 | 74,376 1000 Int$ | -17.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 134,363 1000 Int$ | 105,323 1000 Int$ | 177,023 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 171,071 1000 Int$ | 93,110 1000 Int$ | 231,348 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 123,850 1000 Int$ | 107,614 1000 Int$ | 142,969 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 133,175 1000 Int$ | 68,779 1000 Int$ | 159,802 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 97,552 1000 Int$ | 73,743 1000 Int$ | 124,035 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 105,172 1000 Int$ | 85,162 1000 Int$ | 127,646 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 91,019 1000 Int$ | 74,376 1000 Int$ | 118,263 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Ecuador?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Ecuador was 74,376 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 231,348 1000 Int$ in 1971.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 68,779 1000 Int$ in 1991.
- How does Ecuador rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value?
- Ecuador ranks 109th out of 192 countries with data for 2024.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 41.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.