Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Paraguay

Paraguay: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 0.8958 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
0.8958 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 7.9%
World rank
90th
of 169 countries
All-time high
2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2004
All-time low
0.4034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Paraguay, 1961–2023

0.511.52196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Paraguay stood at 0.8958 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The figure is up 7.9% on the previous year and down 14.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Paraguay peaked at 2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, 0.4034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1961.

That places Paraguay 90th out of 169 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Paraguay, year by year

Annual values for Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre in Paraguay, 1961 to 2023.
Year 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Change
1961 0.4034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre —
1962 0.4034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.0%
1963 0.4083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.2%
1964 0.5799 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +42.0%
1965 0.6103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +5.2%
1966 0.5785 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -5.2%
1967 0.5868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.4%
1968 0.6007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.4%
1969 0.6226 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.6%
1970 0.6314 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.4%
1971 0.4904 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -22.3%
1972 0.4823 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -1.7%
1973 0.4529 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -6.1%
1974 0.5635 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +24.4%
1975 0.5792 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.8%
1976 0.6366 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +9.9%
1977 0.6938 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +9.0%
1978 0.7374 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +6.3%
1979 0.7512 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.9%
1980 0.8038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +7.0%
1981 0.7769 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -3.3%
1982 0.9643 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +24.1%
1983 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.9%
1984 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +6.2%
1985 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.4%
1986 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -0.2%
1987 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +22.2%
1988 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +11.4%
1989 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.0%
1990 1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -11.2%
1991 0.9898 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -26.9%
1992 0.9974 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.8%
1993 0.9782 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -1.9%
1994 0.9473 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -3.2%
1995 1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +23.6%
1996 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -14.3%
1997 1.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +17.9%
1998 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +7.8%
1999 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -12.6%
2000 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -7.5%
2001 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +33.2%
2002 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +22.7%
2003 1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +4.6%
2004 2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +19.0%
2005 1.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -13.3%
2006 1.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.2%
2007 1.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -1.7%
2008 0.8346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -53.9%
2009 0.9777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +17.1%
2010 0.9827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.5%
2011 0.9231 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -6.1%
2012 0.6424 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -30.4%
2013 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +63.4%
2014 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +9.4%
2015 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.3%
2016 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.0%
2017 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.0%
2018 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +4.0%
2019 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.7%
2020 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -1.5%
2021 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.6%
2022 0.8299 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -34.5%
2023 0.8958 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +7.9%

Paraguay compared with similar countries

  • Paraguay's 0.8958 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 67% of the median. (51 countries reporting)
  • Paraguay's 0.8958 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.6151 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 1.5× the median. (32 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Paraguay changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2013 +63.4% 0.6424 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
2008 -53.9% 1.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.5327 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6226 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9
1970s 0.6019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4529 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7512 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
1980s 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7769 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
1990s 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9473 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
2000s 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
2010s 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6424 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
2020s 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8299 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Paraguay

  1. 87 Spain 0.9625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  2. 88 Zambia 0.9568 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  3. 89 Costa Rica 0.9495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  4. 91 Portugal 0.8881 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  5. 92 Kiribati 0.8543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  6. 93 Slovenia 0.8524 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 170 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Paraguay

All data for Paraguay →

Frequently asked questions

What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Paraguay?
Roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Paraguay was 0.8958 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Paraguay?
The highest recorded value was 2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2004.
What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Paraguay?
The lowest recorded value was 0.4034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Paraguay rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Paraguay ranks 90th out of 169 countries with data for 2023.
Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Paraguay?
Over the last ten years it is down 14.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Paraguay data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Paraguay. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/paraguay/">Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Paraguay</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.