Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Mongolia

Mongolia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 16.2%
World rank
159th
of 169 countries
All-time high
0.0395 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2012
All-time low
0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 1972
Years of data
61
1961–2023

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Mongolia, 1961–2023

00.010.020.030.04196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Mongolia is 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.

The figure is down 16.2% on the previous year and down 6.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Mongolia peaked at 0.0395 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1972.

That places Mongolia 159th out of 169 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre in Mongolia, 1961 to 2023.
Year 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Change
1961 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre —
1962 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +45.7%
1963 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -12.1%
1964 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +9.5%
1965 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +6.1%
1966 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -17.6%
1967 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -1.5%
1968 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +28.3%
1969 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -42.9%
1970 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +43.5%
1971 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -10.6%
1972 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -45.2%
1973 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +246.0%
1974 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -35.4%
1975 0.0066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +78.5%
1976 0.0058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -11.5%
1977 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +23.9%
1978 0.0078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +8.7%
1979 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +49.3%
1980 0.0061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -47.7%
1981 0.0065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +6.6%
1982 0.0121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +85.9%
1983 0.0158 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +29.8%
1984 0.0204 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +29.2%
1985 0.0184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -9.6%
1986 0.0215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +16.6%
1987 0.0239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +11.1%
1988 0.0167 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -30.2%
1989 0.0251 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +51.0%
1990 0.0212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -15.7%
1993 0.0097 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -54.2%
1994 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -10.1%
1995 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -3.7%
1996 0.0074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -11.5%
1997 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +18.7%
1998 0.0105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +19.3%
1999 0.0103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -2.1%
2000 0.0095 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -7.6%
2001 0.0094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -1.5%
2002 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -10.6%
2003 0.0127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +50.9%
2004 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.0%
2005 0.0133 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.2%
2006 0.0175 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +31.6%
2007 0.0184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +5.0%
2008 0.0217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +17.7%
2009 0.0243 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +12.2%
2010 0.027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +11.1%
2011 0.0324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +20.1%
2012 0.0395 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +22.0%
2013 0.0308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -22.1%
2014 0.026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -15.7%
2015 0.0263 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.4%
2016 0.0266 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.0%
2017 0.0196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -26.3%
2018 0.0271 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +38.6%
2019 0.0309 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +13.8%
2020 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +27.0%
2021 0.0293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -25.2%
2022 0.0344 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +17.2%
2023 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -16.2%

Mongolia compared with similar countries

  • Mongolia's 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 2% of the median. (51 countries reporting)
  • Mongolia's 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 2% of the median. (22 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Mongolia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
1973 +246.0% 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9
1970s 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
1980s 0.0167 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0251 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
1990s 0.0106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8
2000s 0.0148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0243 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
2010s 0.0286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0395 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
2020s 0.0329 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 156 Bahamas 0.0497 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  2. 157 Botswana 0.0427 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  3. 158 Bahrain 0.0375 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  4. 160 Belize 0.0263 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  5. 161 Somalia 0.0258 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  6. 162 Qatar 0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 170 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Mongolia?
Roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Mongolia was 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 0.0395 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2012.
What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1972.
How does Mongolia rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Mongolia ranks 159th out of 169 countries with data for 2023.
Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is down 6.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 61 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/mongolia/">Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.