Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Kazakhstan, 1992–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Kazakhstan is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 14.1% on the previous year and up 17.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Kazakhstan peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1993 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2013.
That places Kazakhstan 87th out of 168 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +4.7% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -11.4% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +25.5% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -18.6% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -27.6% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -24.5% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -35.5% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -22.0% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -17.3% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +20.6% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -73.4% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.2% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +9.7% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +23.2% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +36.0% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -17.7% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +10.0% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +7.3% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -18.9% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +14.1% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 82% of the median. (51 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 4.6× the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More agriculture & rural data for Kazakhstan
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 1.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0374 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 550.04 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.3844 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3761 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Kazakhstan?
- Roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Kazakhstan was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1993.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2013.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Kazakhstan ranks 87th out of 168 countries with data for 2024.
- Is roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.