Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Namibia

Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate was -0.2717 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
-0.2717 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 257.4%
World rank
117th
of 196 countries
All-time high
6.9 % change on previous year
in 2001
All-time low
-9.64 % change on previous year
in 1992
Years of data
63
1962–2024

Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Namibia, 1962–2024

-10-505196219932024

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

The most recent figure for roots and tubers, total — area harvested, annual growth rate in Namibia is -0.2717 % change on previous year, measured in 2024.

The figure is down 257.4% on the previous year and down 105.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — area harvested, annual growth rate in Namibia peaked at 6.9 % change on previous year in 2001 and was at its lowest, -9.64 % change on previous year, in 1992.

That places Namibia 117th out of 196 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Namibia, year by year

Annual values for Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Namibia, 1962 to 2024.
Year % change on previous year Change
1962 5.88 % change on previous year
1963 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1964 5.56 % change on previous year
1965 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1966 0 % change on previous year
1967 0 % change on previous year
1968 0 % change on previous year
1969 5.26 % change on previous year
1970 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1971 0 % change on previous year
1972 0 % change on previous year
1973 0 % change on previous year
1974 0 % change on previous year
1975 5 % change on previous year
1976 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1977 0 % change on previous year
1978 0 % change on previous year
1979 4.76 % change on previous year
1980 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1981 0 % change on previous year
1982 0 % change on previous year
1983 0 % change on previous year
1984 4.55 % change on previous year
1985 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1986 0 % change on previous year
1987 4.35 % change on previous year
1988 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1989 0 % change on previous year
1990 4.17 % change on previous year
1991 1.81 % change on previous year -56.5%
1992 -9.64 % change on previous year -631.9%
1993 4.35 % change on previous year -145.1%
1994 4.17 % change on previous year -4.2%
1995 4 % change on previous year -4.0%
1996 3.85 % change on previous year -3.8%
1997 3.7 % change on previous year -3.7%
1998 3.57 % change on previous year -3.6%
1999 1.57 % change on previous year -56.0%
2000 2.12 % change on previous year +34.7%
2001 6.9 % change on previous year +225.6%
2002 4.9 % change on previous year -29.0%
2003 3.2 % change on previous year -34.6%
2004 4.51 % change on previous year +40.9%
2005 2.97 % change on previous year -34.2%
2006 2.88 % change on previous year -2.9%
2007 2.98 % change on previous year +3.5%
2008 -2.71 % change on previous year -190.7%
2009 -1.78 % change on previous year -34.1%
2010 5.33 % change on previous year -398.9%
2011 0.9887 % change on previous year -81.5%
2012 2.37 % change on previous year +139.4%
2013 -3.15 % change on previous year -233.0%
2014 5 % change on previous year -258.7%
2015 2.49 % change on previous year -50.1%
2016 0.618 % change on previous year -75.2%
2017 1.08 % change on previous year +74.5%
2018 1.29 % change on previous year +19.9%
2019 1.4 % change on previous year +8.3%
2020 1.52 % change on previous year +8.3%
2021 -1.45 % change on previous year -195.5%
2022 0.4735 % change on previous year -132.7%
2023 0.1726 % change on previous year -63.6%
2024 -0.2717 % change on previous year -257.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 2.09 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 5.88 % change on previous year 8
1970s 0.9762 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 5 % change on previous year 10
1980s 0.8893 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 4.55 % change on previous year 10
1990s 2.15 % change on previous year -9.64 % change on previous year 4.35 % change on previous year 10
2000s 2.6 % change on previous year -2.71 % change on previous year 6.9 % change on previous year 10
2010s 1.74 % change on previous year -3.15 % change on previous year 5.33 % change on previous year 10
2020s 0.0886 % change on previous year -1.45 % change on previous year 1.52 % change on previous year 5

Countries ranked near Namibia

  1. 114 China, mainland -0.2176 % change on previous year compare
  2. 115 Papua New Guinea -0.2372 % change on previous year compare
  3. 116 Ukraine -0.2396 % change on previous year compare
  4. 118 Lesotho -0.3491 % change on previous year compare
  5. 119 South Sudan -0.3578 % change on previous year compare
  6. 120 Lithuania -0.4073 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 240 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Namibia

All data for Namibia →

Frequently asked questions

What is roots and tubers, total — area harvested, annual growth rate in Namibia?
Roots and tubers, total — area harvested, annual growth rate in Namibia was -0.2717 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest roots and tubers, total — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Namibia?
The highest recorded value was 6.9 % change on previous year in 2001.
What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Namibia?
The lowest recorded value was -9.64 % change on previous year in 1992.
How does Namibia rank for roots and tubers, total — area harvested, annual growth rate?
Namibia ranks 117th out of 196 countries with data for 2024.
Is roots and tubers, total — area harvested, annual growth rate rising or falling in Namibia?
Over the last ten years it is down 105.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Namibia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Namibia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/roots-and-tubers-total-area-harvested-annual-growth-rate/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/roots-and-tubers-total-area-harvested-annual-growth-rate/namibia/">Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Namibia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 13,660 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.