Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate in Mozambique
Mozambique: Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate was 11.19 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate in Mozambique, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2024, raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate in Mozambique stood at 11.19 % change on previous year.
That represents a change of up 151.5% on the previous year and up 4,567.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate in Mozambique peaked at 390 % change on previous year in 1991 and was at its lowest, -24.98 % change on previous year, in 2022.
That places Mozambique 12th out of 200 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate in Mozambique, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1964 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1965 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1966 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1967 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1968 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1969 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1970 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1971 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1973 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1974 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1975 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1976 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1977 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1978 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1979 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1981 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1982 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1983 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1984 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1985 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1986 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1987 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1988 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1989 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1990 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1991 | 390 % change on previous year | — |
| 1992 | 1.56 % change on previous year | -99.6% |
| 1993 | 1.3 % change on previous year | -16.7% |
| 1994 | -1.28 % change on previous year | -198.7% |
| 1995 | -1.54 % change on previous year | +19.7% |
| 1996 | 1.56 % change on previous year | -201.6% |
| 1997 | -1.54 % change on previous year | -198.5% |
| 1998 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1999 | -1.8 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2001 | -2.2 % change on previous year | — |
| 2002 | 4.12 % change on previous year | -287.5% |
| 2003 | 1.56 % change on previous year | -62.2% |
| 2004 | 2.48 % change on previous year | +59.1% |
| 2005 | -4.96 % change on previous year | -299.8% |
| 2006 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2007 | 1.09 % change on previous year | — |
| 2008 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2009 | -1.8 % change on previous year | — |
| 2010 | 0.6112 % change on previous year | -133.9% |
| 2011 | 1.7 % change on previous year | +178.3% |
| 2012 | -0.9558 % change on previous year | -156.2% |
| 2013 | 0.6031 % change on previous year | -163.1% |
| 2014 | 0.2398 % change on previous year | -60.2% |
| 2015 | 1.67 % change on previous year | +598.3% |
| 2016 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2017 | -1.65 % change on previous year | — |
| 2018 | 12.44 % change on previous year | -855.3% |
| 2019 | 5.43 % change on previous year | -56.4% |
| 2020 | 0.3027 % change on previous year | -94.4% |
| 2021 | 14.79 % change on previous year | +4785.2% |
| 2022 | -24.98 % change on previous year | -268.9% |
| 2023 | -21.73 % change on previous year | -13.0% |
| 2024 | 11.19 % change on previous year | -151.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 38.83 % change on previous year | -1.8 % change on previous year | 390 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0299 % change on previous year | -4.96 % change on previous year | 4.12 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.01 % change on previous year | -1.65 % change on previous year | 12.44 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -4.08 % change on previous year | -24.98 % change on previous year | 14.79 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
- 9 Mexico 13.14 % change on previous year compare
- 10 Morocco 12.36 % change on previous year compare
- 11 Ukraine 12.11 % change on previous year compare
- 13 Lebanon 11.12 % change on previous year compare
- 14 Austria 10.76 % change on previous year compare
- 15 Lithuania 9.54 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Mozambique
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -0.2557 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2557 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 160.3 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.63 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6279 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 25.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 25.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate in Mozambique?
- Raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate in Mozambique was 11.19 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 390 % change on previous year in 1991.
- What is the lowest raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was -24.98 % change on previous year in 2022.
- How does Mozambique rank for raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate?
- Mozambique ranks 12th out of 200 countries with data for 2024.
- Is raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate rising or falling in Mozambique?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4,567.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.