Raw milk of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP in Belarus
Belarus: Raw milk of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP was 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Raw milk of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP in Belarus, 1992–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP for raw milk of cattle — production, per unit of gdp in 2024.
That represents a change of down 3.1% on the previous year and up 31.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw milk of cattle — production, per unit of gdp in Belarus peaked at 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP, in 2014.
Belarus ranks 1st of 163 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Raw milk of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP in Belarus, year by year
| Year | t per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1993 | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP | -1.2% |
| 1994 | 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP | +7.6% |
| 1995 | 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 1996 | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 1997 | 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP | +7.3% |
| 1998 | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 1999 | 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP | +13.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP | -10.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP | +10.7% |
| 2002 | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP | -16.4% |
| 2003 | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP | -19.7% |
| 2004 | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | -15.3% |
| 2005 | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | -15.5% |
| 2006 | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 2007 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -18.3% |
| 2008 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -21.4% |
| 2009 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +26.2% |
| 2010 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 2011 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 2012 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -2.1% |
| 2013 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 2014 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +46.8% |
| 2016 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +19.8% |
| 2017 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 2018 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 2019 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 2020 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +10.3% |
| 2021 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 2022 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 2023 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +7.8% |
| 2024 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 15.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 11.1× the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 2 Afghanistan 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 3 Uzbekistan 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 4 Kyrgyzstan 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP compare
More agriculture & rural data for Belarus
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 16.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.069 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 709.2 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.13 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2051 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.9% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.6% (2021)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw milk of cattle — production, per unit of gdp in Belarus?
- Raw milk of cattle — production, per unit of gdp in Belarus was 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest raw milk of cattle — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP in 1999.
- What is the lowest raw milk of cattle — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP in 2014.
- How does Belarus rank for raw milk of cattle — production, per unit of gdp?
- Belarus ranks 1st out of 163 countries with data for 2024.
- Is raw milk of cattle — production, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 31.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Raw milk of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Raw milk of cattle — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Raw milk of cattle — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Raw milk of cattle — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Raw milk of cattle — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.