Raw milk of cattle — Production, per square kilometre in Romania
Romania: Raw milk of cattle — Production, per square kilometre was 15.73 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Raw milk of cattle — Production, per square kilometre in Romania, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
Romania recorded 15.73 t per square kilometre for raw milk of cattle — production, per square kilometre in 2023.
The figure is down 0.1% on the previous year and down 9.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw milk of cattle — production, per square kilometre in Romania peaked at 23.1 t per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 9.19 t per square kilometre, in 1964.
That places Romania 39th out of 164 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Raw milk of cattle — Production, per square kilometre in Romania, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 10.85 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 10.44 t per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1963 | 9.49 t per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1964 | 9.19 t per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1965 | 10 t per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1966 | 11.62 t per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 1967 | 12.91 t per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1968 | 11.93 t per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 1969 | 11.89 t per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1970 | 11.96 t per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1971 | 12.28 t per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1972 | 13.74 t per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1973 | 14.72 t per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1974 | 14.7 t per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1975 | 15.01 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1976 | 16.61 t per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1977 | 18.29 t per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1978 | 18.97 t per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1979 | 18.95 t per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1980 | 17.34 t per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 1981 | 15.63 t per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1982 | 14.61 t per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1983 | 16.73 t per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1984 | 17.63 t per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1985 | 16.99 t per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1986 | 16.45 t per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1987 | 16.44 t per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1988 | 17.22 t per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1989 | 14.49 t per square kilometre | -15.9% |
| 1990 | 14.86 t per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1991 | 15.77 t per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1992 | 15.09 t per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1993 | 15.99 t per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1994 | 18.72 t per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 1995 | 20.11 t per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1996 | 20.42 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1997 | 20.21 t per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1998 | 19.65 t per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 1999 | 18.99 t per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2000 | 18.72 t per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2001 | 19.4 t per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2002 | 20.17 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2003 | 21.1 t per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2004 | 21.97 t per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2005 | 21.77 t per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2006 | 23.1 t per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2007 | 21.87 t per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2008 | 21.24 t per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2009 | 20.35 t per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2010 | 17.23 t per square kilometre | -15.3% |
| 2011 | 17.79 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2012 | 16.96 t per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2013 | 17.31 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2014 | 17.95 t per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2015 | 17.41 t per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2016 | 17.19 t per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2017 | 16.58 t per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2018 | 16.51 t per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2019 | 15.92 t per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2020 | 15.99 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2021 | 15.81 t per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2022 | 15.74 t per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2023 | 15.73 t per square kilometre | -0.1% |
Romania compared with similar countries
- Romania's 15.73 t per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 14.15 t per square kilometre, 1.1× the median. (54 countries reporting)
- Romania's 15.73 t per square kilometre is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 19.38 t per square kilometre, 81% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.92 t per square kilometre | 9.19 t per square kilometre | 12.91 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 15.52 t per square kilometre | 11.96 t per square kilometre | 18.97 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 16.35 t per square kilometre | 14.49 t per square kilometre | 17.63 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 17.98 t per square kilometre | 14.86 t per square kilometre | 20.42 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 20.97 t per square kilometre | 18.72 t per square kilometre | 23.1 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 17.08 t per square kilometre | 15.92 t per square kilometre | 17.95 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 15.82 t per square kilometre | 15.73 t per square kilometre | 15.99 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Romania
More agriculture & rural data for Romania
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 19.62 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 676.39 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.1768 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4783 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw milk of cattle — production, per square kilometre in Romania?
- Raw milk of cattle — production, per square kilometre in Romania was 15.73 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest raw milk of cattle — production, per square kilometre recorded in Romania?
- The highest recorded value was 23.1 t per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest raw milk of cattle — production, per square kilometre recorded in Romania?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.19 t per square kilometre in 1964.
- How does Romania rank for raw milk of cattle — production, per square kilometre?
- Romania ranks 39th out of 164 countries with data for 2023.
- Is raw milk of cattle — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Romania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 9.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Romania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Raw milk of cattle — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Raw milk of cattle — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Raw milk of cattle — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Raw milk of cattle — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Raw milk of cattle — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.