Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Lithuania
Lithuania: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Lithuania, 1995–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2017, raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Lithuania stood at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 23 years on record.
That represents a change of down 13.2% on the previous year and down 32.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Lithuania peaked at 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, in 2017.
That places Lithuania 27th out of 128 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -11.0% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -23.0% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -14.9% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -22.3% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -19.2% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +21.3% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +0.7% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +12.6% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -13.2% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, 3.2× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Lithuania's 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, 1.9× the median. (41 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 8 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More agriculture & rural data for Lithuania
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 4.69 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0227 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 748.66 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.7947 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3092 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.3% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Lithuania?
- Raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Lithuania was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 1995.
- What is the lowest raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 2017.
- How does Lithuania rank for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Lithuania ranks 27th out of 128 countries with data for 2017.
- Is raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 32.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.