Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was -0.08 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Zimbabwe recorded -0.08 % change on previous year for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in 2024.
The figure is down 102.7% on the previous year and down 103.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe peaked at 20.69 % change on previous year in 1971 and was at its lowest, -4.65 % change on previous year, in 1981.
Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 148 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 1.15 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 0.7609 % change on previous year | -34.0% |
| 1964 | -3.77 % change on previous year | -596.0% |
| 1965 | 0.7848 % change on previous year | -120.8% |
| 1966 | 1.17 % change on previous year | +48.7% |
| 1967 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1968 | 7.69 % change on previous year | — |
| 1969 | 7.14 % change on previous year | -7.2% |
| 1970 | -3.33 % change on previous year | -146.7% |
| 1971 | 20.69 % change on previous year | -720.7% |
| 1972 | 5.71 % change on previous year | -72.4% |
| 1973 | 6.76 % change on previous year | +18.2% |
| 1974 | -1.27 % change on previous year | -118.7% |
| 1975 | 5.13 % change on previous year | -505.1% |
| 1976 | 7.32 % change on previous year | +42.7% |
| 1977 | 4.55 % change on previous year | -37.9% |
| 1978 | -4.35 % change on previous year | -195.7% |
| 1979 | 2.27 % change on previous year | -152.3% |
| 1980 | -4.44 % change on previous year | -295.5% |
| 1981 | -4.65 % change on previous year | +4.6% |
| 1982 | 2.44 % change on previous year | -152.4% |
| 1983 | 2.38 % change on previous year | -2.4% |
| 1984 | -2.33 % change on previous year | -197.7% |
| 1985 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1986 | 2.38 % change on previous year | — |
| 1987 | 4.65 % change on previous year | +95.4% |
| 1988 | -2.22 % change on previous year | -147.8% |
| 1989 | 2.27 % change on previous year | -202.3% |
| 1990 | 4.44 % change on previous year | +95.5% |
| 2011 | 1.11 % change on previous year | -75.0% |
| 2012 | 2.5 % change on previous year | +124.9% |
| 2013 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2014 | 2.44 % change on previous year | — |
| 2015 | 0.8126 % change on previous year | -66.7% |
| 2016 | 0.7634 % change on previous year | -6.1% |
| 2017 | -2.52 % change on previous year | -430.3% |
| 2018 | -0.0764 % change on previous year | -97.0% |
| 2019 | -3.51 % change on previous year | +4498.7% |
| 2020 | 2.4 % change on previous year | -168.2% |
| 2021 | 3.98 % change on previous year | +66.3% |
| 2022 | 0.8121 % change on previous year | -79.6% |
| 2023 | 2.95 % change on previous year | +263.1% |
| 2024 | -0.08 % change on previous year | -102.7% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's -0.08 % change on previous year is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.4223 % change on previous year. (28 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's -0.08 % change on previous year is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.5514 % change on previous year. (29 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | -4498.7% | -0.0764 % change on previous year | -3.51 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.87 % change on previous year | -3.77 % change on previous year | 7.69 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 4.35 % change on previous year | -4.35 % change on previous year | 20.69 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0481 % change on previous year | -4.65 % change on previous year | 4.65 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.44 % change on previous year | 4.44 % change on previous year | 4.44 % change on previous year | 1 |
| 2010s | 0.1686 % change on previous year | -3.51 % change on previous year | 2.5 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2020s | 2.01 % change on previous year | -0.08 % change on previous year | 3.98 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 94 Cambodia -0.043 % change on previous year compare
- 95 Saint Lucia -0.0737 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Portugal -0.1864 % change on previous year compare
- 98 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) -0.1881 % change on previous year compare
- 99 Germany -0.2266 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Zimbabwe
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 34.41 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0947 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 286.19 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.8815 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.595 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe?
- Raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe was -0.08 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 20.69 % change on previous year in 1971.
- What is the lowest raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was -4.65 % change on previous year in 1981.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Zimbabwe ranks 96th out of 148 countries with data for 2024.
- Is raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 103.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 43 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.