Raw milk of cattle: Gross Production Value (constant) … I constant in New Zealand
New Zealand: Raw milk of cattle: Gross Production Value (constant) … I constant was 8.96 million 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
8.96 million 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 1.3%
World rank
13th
of 239 countries
All-time high
9.13 million 1000 Int$
in 2018
All-time low
2.17 million 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value in New Zealand, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for raw milk of cattle — gross production value in New Zealand is 8.96 million 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.3% on the previous year and up 1.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw milk of cattle — gross production value in New Zealand peaked at 9.13 million 1000 Int$ in 2018 and was at its lowest, 2.17 million 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places New Zealand 13th out of 239 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Raw milk of cattle: Gross Production Value (constant) … I constant in New Zealand, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 2.17 million 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 2.17 million 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1963 | 2.22 million 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1964 | 2.30 million 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 1965 | 2.43 million 1000 Int$ | +5.7% |
| 1966 | 2.55 million 1000 Int$ | +5.1% |
| 1967 | 2.60 million 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1968 | 2.57 million 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 1969 | 2.69 million 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1970 | 2.49 million 1000 Int$ | -7.3% |
| 1971 | 2.48 million 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 1972 | 2.60 million 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 1973 | 2.53 million 1000 Int$ | -2.8% |
| 1974 | 2.37 million 1000 Int$ | -6.3% |
| 1975 | 2.54 million 1000 Int$ | +7.2% |
| 1976 | 2.73 million 1000 Int$ | +7.7% |
| 1977 | 2.77 million 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1978 | 2.53 million 1000 Int$ | -8.5% |
| 1979 | 2.65 million 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1980 | 2.79 million 1000 Int$ | +5.1% |
| 1981 | 2.78 million 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
| 1982 | 2.82 million 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 1983 | 2.88 million 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1984 | 3.17 million 1000 Int$ | +10.2% |
| 1985 | 3.28 million 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1986 | 3.43 million 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1987 | 3.03 million 1000 Int$ | -11.5% |
| 1988 | 3.23 million 1000 Int$ | +6.3% |
| 1989 | 3.02 million 1000 Int$ | -6.4% |
| 1990 | 3.12 million 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 1991 | 3.28 million 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1992 | 3.35 million 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1993 | 3.75 million 1000 Int$ | +11.8% |
| 1994 | 4.08 million 1000 Int$ | +9.0% |
| 1995 | 3.86 million 1000 Int$ | -5.4% |
| 1996 | 4.17 million 1000 Int$ | +7.8% |
| 1997 | 4.60 million 1000 Int$ | +10.5% |
| 1998 | 4.74 million 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 1999 | 4.53 million 1000 Int$ | -4.4% |
| 2000 | 5.09 million 1000 Int$ | +12.4% |
| 2001 | 5.46 million 1000 Int$ | +7.2% |
| 2002 | 5.77 million 1000 Int$ | +5.7% |
| 2003 | 5.97 million 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 2004 | 6.25 million 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 2005 | 6.09 million 1000 Int$ | -2.6% |
| 2006 | 6.31 million 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 2007 | 6.50 million 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 2008 | 6.33 million 1000 Int$ | -2.6% |
| 2009 | 6.86 million 1000 Int$ | +8.3% |
| 2010 | 7.08 million 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 2011 | 7.22 million 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2012 | 7.96 million 1000 Int$ | +10.3% |
| 2013 | 8.10 million 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2014 | 8.87 million 1000 Int$ | +9.5% |
| 2015 | 9.13 million 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 2016 | 8.81 million 1000 Int$ | -3.5% |
| 2017 | 8.93 million 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2018 | 9.13 million 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2019 | 9.07 million 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 2020 | 9.10 million 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 2021 | 9.11 million 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 2022 | 8.76 million 1000 Int$ | -3.8% |
| 2023 | 8.84 million 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 2024 | 8.96 million 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
New Zealand compared with similar countries
- New Zealand's 8.96 million 1000 Int$ is above the median for high income countries, which is 527,776 1000 Int$, 17.0× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- New Zealand's 8.96 million 1000 Int$ is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 10,121 1000 Int$, 885.3× the median. (21 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.41 million 1000 Int$ | 2.17 million 1000 Int$ | 2.69 million 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 2.57 million 1000 Int$ | 2.37 million 1000 Int$ | 2.77 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.04 million 1000 Int$ | 2.78 million 1000 Int$ | 3.43 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.95 million 1000 Int$ | 3.12 million 1000 Int$ | 4.74 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.06 million 1000 Int$ | 5.09 million 1000 Int$ | 6.86 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.43 million 1000 Int$ | 7.08 million 1000 Int$ | 9.13 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 8.95 million 1000 Int$ | 8.76 million 1000 Int$ | 9.11 million 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near New Zealand
- 10 Australia and New Zealand 12.57 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 11 France 10.63 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 12 Pakistan 10.32 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 14 Türkiye 8.76 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 14 Turkey 8.76 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 16 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 6.63 million 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for New Zealand
- Cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate 1.54 % change on previous year (2025)
- Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Cropland extent over the long-term, per capita 0.1262 hectares per person (2025)
- Agricultural area over the long-term, annual growth rate -1.76 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agricultural area over the long-term, per capita 1.76 hectares per person (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -10.07 % change on previous year (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,976 current US$ per person (2023)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.275 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw milk of cattle — gross production value in New Zealand?
- Raw milk of cattle — gross production value in New Zealand was 8.96 million 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest raw milk of cattle — gross production value recorded in New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 9.13 million 1000 Int$ in 2018.
- What is the lowest raw milk of cattle — gross production value recorded in New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.17 million 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does New Zealand rank for raw milk of cattle — gross production value?
- New Zealand ranks 13th out of 239 countries with data for 2024.
- Is raw milk of cattle — gross production value rising or falling in New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.