Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value in Cuba
Cuba: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value was 96,131 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▼ Falling
Latest (2024)
96,131 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 0.1%
World rank
107th
of 184 countries
All-time high
473,872 1000 Int$
in 1983
All-time low
96,048 1000 Int$
in 2023
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value in Cuba, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, raw milk of cattle — gross production value in Cuba stood at 96,131 1000 Int$.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.1% on the previous year and down 60.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw milk of cattle — gross production value in Cuba peaked at 473,872 1000 Int$ in 1983 and was at its lowest, 96,048 1000 Int$, in 2023.
Cuba ranks 107th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value in Cuba, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 145,653 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 153,976 1000 Int$ | +5.7% |
| 1963 | 162,299 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 1964 | 174,784 1000 Int$ | +7.7% |
| 1965 | 183,107 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1966 | 192,262 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1967 | 235,375 1000 Int$ | +22.4% |
| 1968 | 249,691 1000 Int$ | +6.1% |
| 1969 | 270,498 1000 Int$ | +8.3% |
| 1970 | 287,145 1000 Int$ | +6.2% |
| 1971 | 280,902 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 1972 | 315,443 1000 Int$ | +12.3% |
| 1973 | 325,014 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 1974 | 332,505 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1975 | 332,921 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1976 | 341,244 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 1977 | 362,052 1000 Int$ | +6.1% |
| 1978 | 374,536 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1979 | 416,152 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 1980 | 416,152 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 471,999 1000 Int$ | +13.4% |
| 1982 | 468,795 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 1983 | 473,872 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1984 | 471,375 1000 Int$ | -0.5% |
| 1985 | 462,802 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 1986 | 462,220 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1987 | 469,585 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1988 | 466,880 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 1989 | 470,834 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 1990 | 430,467 1000 Int$ | -8.6% |
| 1991 | 341,369 1000 Int$ | -20.7% |
| 1992 | 258,982 1000 Int$ | -24.1% |
| 1993 | 243,705 1000 Int$ | -5.9% |
| 1994 | 264,506 1000 Int$ | +8.5% |
| 1995 | 265,722 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 1996 | 266,356 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 1997 | 270,839 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 1998 | 272,708 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 1999 | 257,117 1000 Int$ | -5.7% |
| 2000 | 255,558 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2001 | 258,295 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2002 | 245,422 1000 Int$ | -5.0% |
| 2003 | 252,812 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 2004 | 213,361 1000 Int$ | -15.6% |
| 2005 | 146,985 1000 Int$ | -31.1% |
| 2006 | 172,786 1000 Int$ | +17.6% |
| 2007 | 201,875 1000 Int$ | +16.8% |
| 2008 | 227,011 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 2009 | 249,816 1000 Int$ | +10.0% |
| 2010 | 261,967 1000 Int$ | +4.9% |
| 2011 | 249,483 1000 Int$ | -4.8% |
| 2012 | 251,480 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 2013 | 245,155 1000 Int$ | -2.5% |
| 2014 | 244,739 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 205,537 1000 Int$ | -16.0% |
| 2016 | 255,018 1000 Int$ | +24.1% |
| 2017 | 223,224 1000 Int$ | -12.5% |
| 2018 | 240,078 1000 Int$ | +7.6% |
| 2019 | 213,070 1000 Int$ | -11.2% |
| 2020 | 189,489 1000 Int$ | -11.1% |
| 2021 | 155,724 1000 Int$ | -17.8% |
| 2022 | 153,810 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 2023 | 96,048 1000 Int$ | -37.6% |
| 2024 | 96,131 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 196,405 1000 Int$ | 145,653 1000 Int$ | 270,498 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 336,791 1000 Int$ | 280,902 1000 Int$ | 416,152 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 463,451 1000 Int$ | 416,152 1000 Int$ | 473,872 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 287,177 1000 Int$ | 243,705 1000 Int$ | 430,467 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 222,392 1000 Int$ | 146,985 1000 Int$ | 258,295 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 238,975 1000 Int$ | 205,537 1000 Int$ | 261,967 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 138,240 1000 Int$ | 96,048 1000 Int$ | 189,489 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More agriculture & rural data for Cuba
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -19.64 % change on previous year (2020)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0276 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 265.29 current US$ per person (2020)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.6522 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2277 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.2% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.2% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.5% (2022)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.4% (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw milk of cattle — gross production value in Cuba?
- Raw milk of cattle — gross production value in Cuba was 96,131 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest raw milk of cattle — gross production value recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 473,872 1000 Int$ in 1983.
- What is the lowest raw milk of cattle — gross production value recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 96,048 1000 Int$ in 2023.
- How does Cuba rank for raw milk of cattle — gross production value?
- Cuba ranks 107th out of 184 countries with data for 2024.
- Is raw milk of cattle — gross production value rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 60.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.