Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile
Chile: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile is 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 2.7% on the previous year and up 0.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile peaked at 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0.4042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places Chile 85th out of 163 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.4277 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.4042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 1963 | 0.4326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1964 | 0.4479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1965 | 0.4675 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1966 | 0.4788 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1967 | 0.4888 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1968 | 0.5257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1969 | 0.5667 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1970 | 0.618 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1971 | 0.5424 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 1972 | 0.5078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1973 | 0.4934 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1974 | 0.5222 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1975 | 0.5517 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1976 | 0.5897 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1977 | 0.579 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1978 | 0.5643 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1979 | 0.5502 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1980 | 0.6232 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1981 | 0.6925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1982 | 0.6094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 1983 | 0.5193 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 1984 | 0.5078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1985 | 0.584 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1986 | 0.6307 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1987 | 0.6348 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1988 | 0.6269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1989 | 0.6884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1990 | 0.7724 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1991 | 0.8116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1992 | 0.8619 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1993 | 0.9235 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1994 | 0.9795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1995 | 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1996 | 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1997 | 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1998 | 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1999 | 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2000 | 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2001 | 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 2002 | 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2003 | 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2004 | 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2005 | 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2006 | 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2007 | 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2008 | 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2009 | 1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2010 | 1.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2011 | 1.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2012 | 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2013 | 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 2014 | 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2016 | 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2017 | 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 2019 | 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2020 | 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2021 | 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2022 | 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2023 | 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 5.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 21% of the median. (53 countries reporting)
- Chile's 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 70% of the median. (31 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4711 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.4042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.5667 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.5519 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.4934 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.618 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.5078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.6925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.9942 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.7724 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 82 Norway 1.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 83 South Africa 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 84 Ethiopia 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 86 Kuwait 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 87 Afghanistan 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 88 Myanmar 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile?
- Raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile was 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Chile rank for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Chile ranks 85th out of 163 countries with data for 2023.
- Is raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.