Raw milk of buffalo — Gross Production Value in China
China: Raw milk of buffalo — Gross Production Value was 1.69 million 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Raw milk of buffalo — Gross Production Value in China, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, raw milk of buffalo — gross production value in China stood at 1.69 million 1000 Int$.
That represents a change of down 3.3% on the previous year and up 2.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw milk of buffalo — gross production value in China peaked at 1.75 million 1000 Int$ in 2023 and was at its lowest, 490,360 1000 Int$, in 1961.
China ranks 3rd of 20 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Raw milk of buffalo — Gross Production Value in China, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 490,360 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 495,975 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1963 | 501,589 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1964 | 505,333 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 1965 | 514,691 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1966 | 520,305 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1967 | 524,049 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 1968 | 527,792 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 1969 | 531,535 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 1970 | 540,091 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1971 | 553,459 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 1972 | 561,481 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1973 | 577,523 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 1974 | 598,913 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1975 | 617,629 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 1976 | 641,692 1000 Int$ | +3.9% |
| 1977 | 663,082 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 1978 | 689,819 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 1979 | 716,556 1000 Int$ | +3.9% |
| 1980 | 743,293 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1981 | 753,988 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1982 | 775,378 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1983 | 802,115 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1984 | 834,200 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 1985 | 866,284 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1986 | 909,064 1000 Int$ | +4.9% |
| 1987 | 962,538 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 1988 | 989,275 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1989 | 999,970 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1990 | 1.02 million 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1991 | 1.04 million 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1992 | 1.07 million 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1993 | 1.09 million 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1994 | 1.12 million 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 1995 | 1.18 million 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1996 | 1.23 million 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1997 | 1.31 million 1000 Int$ | +6.5% |
| 1998 | 1.34 million 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1999 | 1.39 million 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 2000 | 1.42 million 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2001 | 1.43 million 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2002 | 1.44 million 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2003 | 1.47 million 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2004 | 1.41 million 1000 Int$ | -4.1% |
| 2005 | 1.50 million 1000 Int$ | +6.2% |
| 2006 | 1.52 million 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2007 | 1.55 million 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2008 | 1.58 million 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 2009 | 1.60 million 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 2010 | 1.63 million 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 2011 | 1.63 million 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1.65 million 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 2013 | 1.63 million 1000 Int$ | -1.0% |
| 2014 | 1.66 million 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2015 | 1.55 million 1000 Int$ | -6.6% |
| 2016 | 1.56 million 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2017 | 1.53 million 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 2018 | 1.55 million 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2019 | 1.57 million 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 2020 | 1.63 million 1000 Int$ | +3.6% |
| 2021 | 1.66 million 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 2022 | 1.71 million 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 2023 | 1.75 million 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2024 | 1.69 million 1000 Int$ | -3.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 512,403 1000 Int$ | 490,360 1000 Int$ | 531,535 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 616,024 1000 Int$ | 540,091 1000 Int$ | 716,556 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 863,610 1000 Int$ | 743,293 1000 Int$ | 999,970 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.18 million 1000 Int$ | 1.02 million 1000 Int$ | 1.39 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.49 million 1000 Int$ | 1.41 million 1000 Int$ | 1.60 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.60 million 1000 Int$ | 1.53 million 1000 Int$ | 1.66 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.69 million 1000 Int$ | 1.63 million 1000 Int$ | 1.75 million 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near China
- 1 India 56.42 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 2 Pakistan 21.28 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 China, mainland 1.69 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 48,728 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 Türkiye 31,081 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Nepal 749,794 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Viet Nam 13,451 1000 Int$ compare
- 6 Egypt 706,753 1000 Int$ compare
- 6 Syrian Arab Republic 2,607 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for China
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 1.98 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0666 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 923.03 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.48 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3366 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw milk of buffalo — gross production value in China?
- Raw milk of buffalo — gross production value in China was 1.69 million 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest raw milk of buffalo — gross production value recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 1.75 million 1000 Int$ in 2023.
- What is the lowest raw milk of buffalo — gross production value recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 490,360 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does China rank for raw milk of buffalo — gross production value?
- China ranks 3rd out of 20 countries with data for 2024.
- Is raw milk of buffalo — gross production value rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Raw milk of buffalo — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.