Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per unit of GDP in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka: Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per unit of GDP was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1990. ◆ Volatile
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per unit of GDP in Sri Lanka, 1961–1990
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Sri Lanka recorded 0 t per US$ of GDP for raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per unit of gdp in 1990. That is the lowest value across all 30 years on record.
That represents a change of down 30.4% on the previous year and down 71.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per unit of gdp in Sri Lanka peaked at 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1964 and was at its lowest, 0 t per US$ of GDP, in 1990.
That places Sri Lanka 127th out of 159 countries with data for 1990, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per unit of GDP in Sri Lanka, year by year
| Year | t per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1963 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +15.6% |
| 1964 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 1965 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 1966 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 1967 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +7.6% |
| 1968 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 1969 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -20.6% |
| 1970 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -14.4% |
| 1971 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 1972 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -15.0% |
| 1973 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1974 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 1975 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1976 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 1977 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1978 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +50.2% |
| 1979 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -25.0% |
| 1980 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 1981 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 1982 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +5.8% |
| 1983 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -25.0% |
| 1984 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 1985 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1986 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -20.0% |
| 1987 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 1988 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 1989 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 1990 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -30.4% |
Sri Lanka compared with similar countries
- Sri Lanka's 0 t per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 23% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Sri Lanka's 0 t per US$ of GDP is below the median for South Asia, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 73% of the median. (5 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 1 |
Countries ranked near Sri Lanka
More agriculture & rural data for Sri Lanka
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 9.1 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0836 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 418.3 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.9172 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.7955 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 8.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 8.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.7% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.9% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per unit of gdp in Sri Lanka?
- Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per unit of gdp in Sri Lanka was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1990, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The highest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1964.
- What is the lowest raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1990.
- How does Sri Lanka rank for raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per unit of gdp?
- Sri Lanka ranks 127th out of 159 countries with data for 1990.
- Is raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
- Over the last ten years it is down 71.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 30 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.