Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square in Ecuador
Ecuador: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square was 1.69 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square in Ecuador stood at 1.69 t per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 20.8% on the previous year and down 30.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square in Ecuador peaked at 2.65 t per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, 0.4876 t per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places Ecuador 42nd out of 124 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.5707 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.4876 t per square kilometre | -14.6% |
| 1963 | 0.5418 t per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1964 | 0.6683 t per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 1965 | 0.7658 t per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1966 | 0.7004 t per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 1967 | 0.825 t per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 1968 | 0.8532 t per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1969 | 0.8171 t per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1970 | 0.9793 t per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 1971 | 1 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1972 | 0.9825 t per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1973 | 0.9796 t per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1974 | 1.03 t per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1975 | 1.04 t per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1976 | 1.09 t per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1977 | 1.02 t per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1978 | 1.28 t per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 1979 | 1.29 t per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1980 | 1.34 t per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1981 | 1.16 t per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 1982 | 0.9175 t per square kilometre | -20.9% |
| 1983 | 0.7947 t per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1984 | 1.19 t per square kilometre | +49.5% |
| 1985 | 1.02 t per square kilometre | -14.6% |
| 1986 | 1.03 t per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1987 | 1.16 t per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1988 | 1.06 t per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1989 | 1.14 t per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1990 | 1.2 t per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1991 | 1.18 t per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1992 | 1.26 t per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1993 | 1.23 t per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1994 | 1.31 t per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1995 | 1.43 t per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1996 | 1.49 t per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1997 | 0.9112 t per square kilometre | -38.8% |
| 1998 | 2.13 t per square kilometre | +134.2% |
| 1999 | 2.18 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2000 | 2.08 t per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2001 | 2.38 t per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 2002 | 2.29 t per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 2003 | 2.03 t per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 2004 | 2.65 t per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 2005 | 2.34 t per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2006 | 2.01 t per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 2007 | 1.98 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2008 | 2.05 t per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2009 | 2.07 t per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2010 | 2 t per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2011 | 2.19 t per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2012 | 2.38 t per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2013 | 2.45 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2014 | 2.39 t per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2015 | 2.32 t per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2016 | 2.63 t per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 2017 | 2.38 t per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 2018 | 2.32 t per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2019 | 2.26 t per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2020 | 2.24 t per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2021 | 2.25 t per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2022 | 2.13 t per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2023 | 1.69 t per square kilometre | -20.8% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 1.69 t per square kilometre is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1.13 t per square kilometre, 1.5× the median. (40 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 1.69 t per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.88 t per square kilometre, 90% of the median. (30 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | +134.2% | 0.9112 t per square kilometre | 2.13 t per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6922 t per square kilometre | 0.4876 t per square kilometre | 0.8532 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.07 t per square kilometre | 0.9793 t per square kilometre | 1.29 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.08 t per square kilometre | 0.7947 t per square kilometre | 1.34 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.43 t per square kilometre | 0.9112 t per square kilometre | 2.18 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.19 t per square kilometre | 1.98 t per square kilometre | 2.65 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.33 t per square kilometre | 2 t per square kilometre | 2.63 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.08 t per square kilometre | 1.69 t per square kilometre | 2.25 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square in Ecuador?
- Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square in Ecuador was 1.69 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 2.65 t per square kilometre in 2004.
- What is the lowest raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4876 t per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Ecuador rank for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square?
- Ecuador ranks 42nd out of 124 countries with data for 2023.
- Is raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 30.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.