Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, annual growth in Latvia
Latvia: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, annual growth was -15.67 % change on previous year in 2006. ◆ Volatile
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, annual growth in Latvia, 1993–2006
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2006, raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth in Latvia stood at -15.67 % change on previous year.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 359.3% on the previous year and down 370.2% over five years.
Over the whole period, raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth in Latvia peaked at 65.05 % change on previous year in 1998 and was at its lowest, -31.43 % change on previous year, in 1993.
Latvia ranks 117th of 152 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, annual growth in Latvia, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1993 | -31.43 % change on previous year | — |
| 1994 | 14.33 % change on previous year | -145.6% |
| 1995 | 20.26 % change on previous year | +41.4% |
| 1996 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1997 | 24.85 % change on previous year | — |
| 1998 | 65.05 % change on previous year | +161.8% |
| 1999 | 3.82 % change on previous year | -94.1% |
| 2000 | -10.76 % change on previous year | -381.5% |
| 2001 | -3.33 % change on previous year | -69.0% |
| 2002 | 49.92 % change on previous year | -1597.5% |
| 2003 | -19.06 % change on previous year | -138.2% |
| 2004 | -1.49 % change on previous year | -92.2% |
| 2005 | 6.04 % change on previous year | -506.0% |
| 2006 | -15.67 % change on previous year | -359.3% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's -15.67 % change on previous year is below the median for high income countries, which is -6.31 % change on previous year, 2.5× the median. (37 countries reporting)
- Latvia's -15.67 % change on previous year is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -1.69 % change on previous year, 9.3× the median. (36 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, annual growth in Latvia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | +1597.5% | -3.33 % change on previous year | 49.92 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.84 % change on previous year | -31.43 % change on previous year | 65.05 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 2000s | 0.8062 % change on previous year | -19.06 % change on previous year | 49.92 % change on previous year | 7 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 114 Switzerland -14.05 % change on previous year compare
- 115 Mexico -15.51 % change on previous year compare
- 116 Croatia -15.58 % change on previous year compare
- 118 Costa Rica -15.79 % change on previous year compare
- 119 Sri Lanka -16.46 % change on previous year compare
- 120 Somalia -16.67 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Latvia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,055 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3137 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.1% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth in Latvia?
- Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth in Latvia was -15.67 % change on previous year in 2006, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 65.05 % change on previous year in 1998.
- What is the lowest raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was -31.43 % change on previous year in 1993.
- How does Latvia rank for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth?
- Latvia ranks 117th out of 152 countries with data for 2006.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.