Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, annual growth in Finland
Finland: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, annual growth was 11.03 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
11.03 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 284.6%
World rank
31st
of 152 countries
All-time high
109.58 % change on previous year
in 1988
All-time low
-47.59 % change on previous year
in 1987
Years of data
62
1962–2023
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, annual growth in Finland, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Finland recorded 11.03 % change on previous year for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth in 2023.
That represents a change of up 284.6% on the previous year and down 57.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth in Finland peaked at 109.58 % change on previous year in 1988 and was at its lowest, -47.59 % change on previous year, in 1987.
Finland ranks 31st of 152 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, annual growth in Finland, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | -36.76 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 32.56 % change on previous year | -188.6% |
| 1964 | 5.26 % change on previous year | -83.8% |
| 1965 | -23.33 % change on previous year | -543.3% |
| 1966 | 55.22 % change on previous year | -336.6% |
| 1967 | -6.16 % change on previous year | -111.2% |
| 1968 | -20.9 % change on previous year | +239.1% |
| 1969 | 11.89 % change on previous year | -156.9% |
| 1970 | 9.61 % change on previous year | -19.1% |
| 1971 | 8.15 % change on previous year | -15.2% |
| 1972 | 40.83 % change on previous year | +400.7% |
| 1973 | -11.11 % change on previous year | -127.2% |
| 1974 | 1.82 % change on previous year | -116.4% |
| 1975 | 7.14 % change on previous year | +292.9% |
| 1976 | -12.5 % change on previous year | -275.0% |
| 1977 | -3.33 % change on previous year | -73.3% |
| 1978 | 28.33 % change on previous year | -949.8% |
| 1979 | -8.73 % change on previous year | -130.8% |
| 1980 | 29.34 % change on previous year | -435.9% |
| 1981 | -22.76 % change on previous year | -177.6% |
| 1982 | 22.11 % change on previous year | -197.1% |
| 1983 | 34.48 % change on previous year | +56.0% |
| 1984 | -17.95 % change on previous year | -152.1% |
| 1985 | -18.75 % change on previous year | +4.5% |
| 1986 | 26.92 % change on previous year | -243.6% |
| 1987 | -47.59 % change on previous year | -276.8% |
| 1988 | 109.58 % change on previous year | -330.3% |
| 1989 | 16.55 % change on previous year | -84.9% |
| 1990 | 3.18 % change on previous year | -80.8% |
| 1991 | -5.38 % change on previous year | -269.0% |
| 1992 | -10.99 % change on previous year | +104.5% |
| 1993 | -5.05 % change on previous year | -54.0% |
| 1994 | 12.59 % change on previous year | -349.3% |
| 1995 | 4.61 % change on previous year | -63.4% |
| 1996 | -17.91 % change on previous year | -488.9% |
| 1997 | 30.14 % change on previous year | -268.3% |
| 1998 | -28.95 % change on previous year | -196.1% |
| 1999 | 44.55 % change on previous year | -253.9% |
| 2000 | -20.09 % change on previous year | -145.1% |
| 2001 | -1.81 % change on previous year | -91.0% |
| 2002 | 13.86 % change on previous year | -867.7% |
| 2003 | -15.53 % change on previous year | -212.0% |
| 2004 | 15.96 % change on previous year | -202.8% |
| 2005 | 20.1 % change on previous year | +26.0% |
| 2006 | -25.13 % change on previous year | -225.0% |
| 2007 | -21.16 % change on previous year | -15.8% |
| 2008 | -29.16 % change on previous year | +37.8% |
| 2009 | 13.26 % change on previous year | -145.5% |
| 2010 | -10.48 % change on previous year | -179.0% |
| 2011 | 17.43 % change on previous year | -266.4% |
| 2012 | -37.96 % change on previous year | -317.8% |
| 2013 | 25.81 % change on previous year | -168.0% |
| 2014 | 35.87 % change on previous year | +39.0% |
| 2015 | -35 % change on previous year | -197.6% |
| 2016 | 18.46 % change on previous year | -152.7% |
| 2017 | -9.09 % change on previous year | -149.2% |
| 2018 | -17.14 % change on previous year | +88.6% |
| 2019 | 37.93 % change on previous year | -321.3% |
| 2020 | -14.75 % change on previous year | -138.9% |
| 2021 | -4.57 % change on previous year | -69.0% |
| 2022 | -5.97 % change on previous year | +30.7% |
| 2023 | 11.03 % change on previous year | -284.6% |
Finland compared with similar countries
- Finland's 11.03 % change on previous year is above the median for high income countries, which is -6.31 % change on previous year. (37 countries reporting)
- Finland's 11.03 % change on previous year is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -1.69 % change on previous year. (36 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.22 % change on previous year | -36.76 % change on previous year | 55.22 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 6.02 % change on previous year | -12.5 % change on previous year | 40.83 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 13.19 % change on previous year | -47.59 % change on previous year | 109.58 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.68 % change on previous year | -28.95 % change on previous year | 44.55 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -4.97 % change on previous year | -29.16 % change on previous year | 20.1 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.58 % change on previous year | -37.96 % change on previous year | 37.93 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -3.57 % change on previous year | -14.75 % change on previous year | 11.03 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 28 Türkiye 13.08 % change on previous year compare
- 29 China, mainland 11.16 % change on previous year compare
- 30 China 11.14 % change on previous year compare
- 32 Brazil 10.83 % change on previous year compare
- 33 Nepal 9.09 % change on previous year compare
- 34 Serbia and Montenegro 8.88 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Finland
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.33 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0261 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,466 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5476 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2548 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 7.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth in Finland?
- Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth in Finland was 11.03 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 109.58 % change on previous year in 1988.
- What is the lowest raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was -47.59 % change on previous year in 1987.
- How does Finland rank for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth?
- Finland ranks 31st out of 152 countries with data for 2023.
- Is raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, annual growth rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 57.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.