Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value in New Zealand
New Zealand: Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value was 930 1000 SLC in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
930 1000 SLC
Change on year
up 1.6%
World rank
51st
of 53 countries
All-time high
3,167 1000 SLC
in 1987
All-time low
62 1000 SLC
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value in New Zealand, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 SLC.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rape or colza seed — gross production value in New Zealand is 930 1000 SLC, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.6% on the previous year and down 15.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rape or colza seed — gross production value in New Zealand peaked at 3,167 1000 SLC in 1987 and was at its lowest, 62 1000 SLC, in 1961.
New Zealand ranks 51st of 53 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value in New Zealand, year by year
| Year | 1000 SLC | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 62 1000 SLC | — |
| 1962 | 62 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 62 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 62 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 83 1000 SLC | +33.9% |
| 1966 | 125 1000 SLC | +50.6% |
| 1967 | 166 1000 SLC | +32.8% |
| 1968 | 166 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 166 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 166 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 166 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 166 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 145 1000 SLC | -12.7% |
| 1974 | 105 1000 SLC | -27.6% |
| 1975 | 187 1000 SLC | +78.1% |
| 1976 | 208 1000 SLC | +11.2% |
| 1977 | 312 1000 SLC | +50.0% |
| 1978 | 291 1000 SLC | -6.7% |
| 1979 | 312 1000 SLC | +7.2% |
| 1980 | 270 1000 SLC | -13.5% |
| 1981 | 208 1000 SLC | -23.0% |
| 1982 | 216 1000 SLC | +3.8% |
| 1983 | 208 1000 SLC | -3.7% |
| 1984 | 208 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 332 1000 SLC | +59.6% |
| 1986 | 3,115 1000 SLC | +838.3% |
| 1987 | 3,167 1000 SLC | +1.7% |
| 1988 | 2,614 1000 SLC | -17.5% |
| 1989 | 964 1000 SLC | -63.1% |
| 1990 | 914 1000 SLC | -5.2% |
| 1991 | 914 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 914 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1,246 1000 SLC | +36.3% |
| 1994 | 1,869 1000 SLC | +50.0% |
| 1995 | 1,994 1000 SLC | +6.7% |
| 1996 | 1,939 1000 SLC | -2.8% |
| 1997 | 2,035 1000 SLC | +5.0% |
| 1998 | 1,661 1000 SLC | -18.4% |
| 1999 | 1,661 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1,661 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1,661 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1,661 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1,661 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1,661 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1,433 1000 SLC | -13.7% |
| 2006 | 1,212 1000 SLC | -15.4% |
| 2007 | 831 1000 SLC | -31.4% |
| 2008 | 782 1000 SLC | -5.9% |
| 2009 | 1,337 1000 SLC | +71.0% |
| 2010 | 1,276 1000 SLC | -4.6% |
| 2011 | 1,244 1000 SLC | -2.5% |
| 2012 | 1,212 1000 SLC | -2.6% |
| 2013 | 1,181 1000 SLC | -2.6% |
| 2014 | 1,103 1000 SLC | -6.6% |
| 2015 | 703 1000 SLC | -36.3% |
| 2016 | 995 1000 SLC | +41.5% |
| 2017 | 934 1000 SLC | -6.1% |
| 2018 | 877 1000 SLC | -6.1% |
| 2019 | 935 1000 SLC | +6.6% |
| 2020 | 915 1000 SLC | -2.1% |
| 2021 | 909 1000 SLC | -0.7% |
| 2022 | 920 1000 SLC | +1.2% |
| 2023 | 915 1000 SLC | -0.5% |
| 2024 | 930 1000 SLC | +1.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 106 1000 SLC | 62 1000 SLC | 166 1000 SLC | 9 |
| 1970s | 205.8 1000 SLC | 105 1000 SLC | 312 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1980s | 1,130 1000 SLC | 208 1000 SLC | 3,167 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1990s | 1,515 1000 SLC | 914 1000 SLC | 2,035 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2000s | 1,390 1000 SLC | 782 1000 SLC | 1,661 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,046 1000 SLC | 703 1000 SLC | 1,276 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2020s | 917.8 1000 SLC | 909 1000 SLC | 930 1000 SLC | 5 |
Countries ranked near New Zealand
- 48 Slovenia 2,993 1000 SLC compare
- 49 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 2,588 1000 SLC compare
- 50 Tunisia 2,453 1000 SLC compare
- 52 Kyrgyzstan 397 1000 SLC compare
- 53 Tajikistan 390 1000 SLC compare
More agriculture & rural data for New Zealand
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -10.07 % change on previous year (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,976 current US$ per person (2023)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.275 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.16 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2023)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rape or colza seed — gross production value in New Zealand?
- Rape or colza seed — gross production value in New Zealand was 930 1000 SLC in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest rape or colza seed — gross production value recorded in New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 3,167 1000 SLC in 1987.
- What is the lowest rape or colza seed — gross production value recorded in New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 62 1000 SLC in 1961.
- How does New Zealand rank for rape or colza seed — gross production value?
- New Zealand ranks 51st out of 53 countries with data for 2024.
- Is rape or colza seed — gross production value rising or falling in New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is down 15.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.