Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value in New Zealand
New Zealand: Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value was 1,052 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value in New Zealand, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, rape or colza seed — gross production value in New Zealand stood at 1,052 1000 Int$.
The figure is up 1.5% on the previous year and down 15.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rape or colza seed — gross production value in New Zealand peaked at 3,585 1000 Int$ in 1987 and was at its lowest, 71 1000 Int$, in 1961.
New Zealand ranks 59th of 67 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value in New Zealand, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 71 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 71 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 71 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 71 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 94 1000 Int$ | +32.4% |
| 1966 | 141 1000 Int$ | +50.0% |
| 1967 | 188 1000 Int$ | +33.3% |
| 1968 | 188 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 188 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 188 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 188 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 188 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 165 1000 Int$ | -12.2% |
| 1974 | 118 1000 Int$ | -28.5% |
| 1975 | 212 1000 Int$ | +79.7% |
| 1976 | 235 1000 Int$ | +10.8% |
| 1977 | 353 1000 Int$ | +50.2% |
| 1978 | 329 1000 Int$ | -6.8% |
| 1979 | 353 1000 Int$ | +7.3% |
| 1980 | 306 1000 Int$ | -13.3% |
| 1981 | 235 1000 Int$ | -23.2% |
| 1982 | 244 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1983 | 235 1000 Int$ | -3.7% |
| 1984 | 235 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 376 1000 Int$ | +60.0% |
| 1986 | 3,526 1000 Int$ | +837.8% |
| 1987 | 3,585 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 1988 | 2,959 1000 Int$ | -17.5% |
| 1989 | 1,091 1000 Int$ | -63.1% |
| 1990 | 1,034 1000 Int$ | -5.2% |
| 1991 | 1,034 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1,034 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1,411 1000 Int$ | +36.5% |
| 1994 | 2,116 1000 Int$ | +50.0% |
| 1995 | 2,257 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 1996 | 2,195 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 1997 | 2,304 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1998 | 1,881 1000 Int$ | -18.4% |
| 1999 | 1,881 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1,881 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1,881 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1,881 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1,881 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1,881 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1,622 1000 Int$ | -13.8% |
| 2006 | 1,372 1000 Int$ | -15.4% |
| 2007 | 940 1000 Int$ | -31.5% |
| 2008 | 885 1000 Int$ | -5.9% |
| 2009 | 1,514 1000 Int$ | +71.1% |
| 2010 | 1,444 1000 Int$ | -4.6% |
| 2011 | 1,408 1000 Int$ | -2.5% |
| 2012 | 1,373 1000 Int$ | -2.5% |
| 2013 | 1,337 1000 Int$ | -2.6% |
| 2014 | 1,248 1000 Int$ | -6.7% |
| 2015 | 796 1000 Int$ | -36.2% |
| 2016 | 1,127 1000 Int$ | +41.6% |
| 2017 | 1,057 1000 Int$ | -6.2% |
| 2018 | 993 1000 Int$ | -6.1% |
| 2019 | 1,059 1000 Int$ | +6.6% |
| 2020 | 1,036 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 2021 | 1,029 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 2022 | 1,042 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 2023 | 1,036 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2024 | 1,052 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 120.33 1000 Int$ | 71 1000 Int$ | 188 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 232.9 1000 Int$ | 118 1000 Int$ | 353 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 1,279 1000 Int$ | 235 1000 Int$ | 3,585 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 1,715 1000 Int$ | 1,034 1000 Int$ | 2,304 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 1,574 1000 Int$ | 885 1000 Int$ | 1,881 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,184 1000 Int$ | 796 1000 Int$ | 1,444 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,039 1000 Int$ | 1,029 1000 Int$ | 1,052 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near New Zealand
- 56 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2,141 1000 Int$ compare
- 57 Serbia and Montenegro 1,567 1000 Int$ compare
- 58 Japan 1,476 1000 Int$ compare
- 60 Mexico 940 1000 Int$ compare
- 60 Morocco 940 1000 Int$ compare
- 62 Uzbekistan 601 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for New Zealand
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -10.07 % change on previous year (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,976 current US$ per person (2023)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.275 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.16 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2023)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rape or colza seed — gross production value in New Zealand?
- Rape or colza seed — gross production value in New Zealand was 1,052 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest rape or colza seed — gross production value recorded in New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 3,585 1000 Int$ in 1987.
- What is the lowest rape or colza seed — gross production value recorded in New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 71 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does New Zealand rank for rape or colza seed — gross production value?
- New Zealand ranks 59th out of 67 countries with data for 2024.
- Is rape or colza seed — gross production value rising or falling in New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is down 15.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.