Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Estonia
Estonia: Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Estonia, 1993–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for pulses, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Estonia is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 8.9% on the previous year and up 98.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, pulses, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Estonia peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 1993.
Estonia ranks 60th of 151 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Estonia, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +50.4% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +426.8% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +38.7% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +40.2% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -33.6% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -54.8% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +34.8% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -44.9% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +40.0% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -20.6% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -22.4% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +27.2% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +50.0% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +28.5% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +13.1% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +32.5% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +90.1% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +68.0% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +5.8% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -37.2% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +15.5% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -15.4% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +0.7% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +8.9% |
Estonia compared with similar countries
- Estonia's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 20.1× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Estonia's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 8.9× the median. (42 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Estonia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | +426.8% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 7 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Estonia
More agriculture & rural data for Estonia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 1.64 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0165 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 566.81 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5048 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2928 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 6.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pulses, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Estonia?
- Pulses, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Estonia was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest pulses, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Estonia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2017.
- What is the lowest pulses, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Estonia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1993.
- How does Estonia rank for pulses, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Estonia ranks 60th out of 151 countries with data for 2024.
- Is pulses, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Estonia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 98.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Estonia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Pulses, Total — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Pulses, Total — Area harvested ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Pulses, Total — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Pulses, Total — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.