Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Latvia
Latvia: Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 1.13 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Latvia, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre in Latvia is 1.13 ha per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 32 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 47.4% on the previous year and up 908.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre in Latvia peaked at 1.13 ha per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0228 ha per square kilometre, in 2006.
That places Latvia 37th out of 151 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Latvia, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.1077 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0.0521 ha per square kilometre | -51.6% |
| 1994 | 0.045 ha per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 1995 | 0.0482 ha per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1996 | 0.0579 ha per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0755 ha per square kilometre | +30.6% |
| 1998 | 0.1093 ha per square kilometre | +44.7% |
| 1999 | 0.0402 ha per square kilometre | -63.2% |
| 2000 | 0.0337 ha per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0514 ha per square kilometre | +52.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0402 ha per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 2003 | 0.0466 ha per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0402 ha per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2005 | 0.0355 ha per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 2006 | 0.0228 ha per square kilometre | -35.8% |
| 2007 | 0.0267 ha per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 2008 | 0.026 ha per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2009 | 0.0409 ha per square kilometre | +57.3% |
| 2010 | 0.0424 ha per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2011 | 0.0599 ha per square kilometre | +41.3% |
| 2012 | 0.0678 ha per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 2013 | 0.1125 ha per square kilometre | +66.0% |
| 2014 | 0.1885 ha per square kilometre | +67.6% |
| 2015 | 0.4998 ha per square kilometre | +165.1% |
| 2016 | 0.6557 ha per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 2017 | 0.7762 ha per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 2018 | 0.834 ha per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2019 | 0.6283 ha per square kilometre | -24.7% |
| 2020 | 0.6813 ha per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2021 | 0.7762 ha per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2022 | 0.7697 ha per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2023 | 1.13 ha per square kilometre | +47.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.067 ha per square kilometre | 0.0402 ha per square kilometre | 0.1093 ha per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.0364 ha per square kilometre | 0.0228 ha per square kilometre | 0.0514 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.3865 ha per square kilometre | 0.0424 ha per square kilometre | 0.834 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8404 ha per square kilometre | 0.6813 ha per square kilometre | 1.13 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More agriculture & rural data for Latvia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,055 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3137 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.1% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre in Latvia?
- Pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre in Latvia was 1.13 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.13 ha per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0228 ha per square kilometre in 2006.
- How does Latvia rank for pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Latvia ranks 37th out of 151 countries with data for 2023.
- Is pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 908.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Pulses, Total — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Pulses, Total — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Pulses, Total — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Pulses, Total — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.