Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Cuba
Cuba: Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 0.4295 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Cuba, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 0.4295 ha per square kilometre for pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre in 2023.
The figure is down 38.4% on the previous year and down 62.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre in Cuba peaked at 1.42 ha per square kilometre in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0.1397 ha per square kilometre, in 1975.
That places Cuba 60th out of 151 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Cuba, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.6331 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.6331 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.6052 ha per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1964 | 0.5773 ha per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1965 | 0.5587 ha per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1966 | 0.5587 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.5587 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.419 ha per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1969 | 0.3259 ha per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 1970 | 0.3259 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.3259 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.3724 ha per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1973 | 0.1862 ha per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1974 | 0.1676 ha per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1975 | 0.1397 ha per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1976 | 0.1397 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.2328 ha per square kilometre | +66.7% |
| 1978 | 0.2514 ha per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1979 | 0.2514 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.3641 ha per square kilometre | +44.8% |
| 1981 | 0.3175 ha per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 1982 | 0.3724 ha per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 1983 | 0.3603 ha per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1984 | 0.3547 ha per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1985 | 0.3855 ha per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1986 | 0.3678 ha per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1987 | 0.487 ha per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 1988 | 0.4739 ha per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 1989 | 0.5028 ha per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1990 | 0.4643 ha per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1991 | 0.425 ha per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 1992 | 0.9173 ha per square kilometre | +115.8% |
| 1993 | 0.9522 ha per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1994 | 1.07 ha per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1995 | 0.8764 ha per square kilometre | -17.8% |
| 1996 | 0.9038 ha per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1997 | 0.9876 ha per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1998 | 0.9613 ha per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 1999 | 0.8608 ha per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2000 | 0.9844 ha per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 2001 | 0.9614 ha per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2002 | 0.9421 ha per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2003 | 1 ha per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2004 | 1.05 ha per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2005 | 0.8908 ha per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 2006 | 0.721 ha per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 2007 | 0.7872 ha per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2008 | 0.8954 ha per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 2009 | 1.41 ha per square kilometre | +58.0% |
| 2010 | 1.06 ha per square kilometre | -25.1% |
| 2011 | 1.16 ha per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2012 | 1.16 ha per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2013 | 1.15 ha per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2014 | 1.25 ha per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2015 | 0.9482 ha per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 2016 | 1.18 ha per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 2017 | 1.14 ha per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2018 | 1.42 ha per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 2019 | 0.9522 ha per square kilometre | -33.0% |
| 2020 | 0.7042 ha per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 2021 | 0.6505 ha per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 2022 | 0.697 ha per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2023 | 0.4295 ha per square kilometre | -38.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5411 ha per square kilometre | 0.3259 ha per square kilometre | 0.6331 ha per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2393 ha per square kilometre | 0.1397 ha per square kilometre | 0.3724 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.3986 ha per square kilometre | 0.3175 ha per square kilometre | 0.5028 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8415 ha per square kilometre | 0.425 ha per square kilometre | 1.07 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9655 ha per square kilometre | 0.721 ha per square kilometre | 1.41 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.14 ha per square kilometre | 0.9482 ha per square kilometre | 1.42 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6203 ha per square kilometre | 0.4295 ha per square kilometre | 0.7042 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 57 North Macedonia 0.4437 ha per square kilometre compare
- 58 Thailand 0.4423 ha per square kilometre compare
- 59 Palestine, State of 0.4363 ha per square kilometre compare
- 61 Eritrea 0.4116 ha per square kilometre compare
- 62 Maldives 0.3993 ha per square kilometre compare
- 63 Slovakia 0.3773 ha per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Cuba
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -19.64 % change on previous year (2020)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0276 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 265.29 current US$ per person (2020)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.6522 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2277 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.2% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.2% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.5% (2022)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.4% (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre in Cuba?
- Pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre in Cuba was 0.4295 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 1.42 ha per square kilometre in 2018.
- What is the lowest pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1397 ha per square kilometre in 1975.
- How does Cuba rank for pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Cuba ranks 60th out of 151 countries with data for 2023.
- Is pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 62.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Pulses, Total — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Pulses, Total — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Pulses, Total — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Pulses, Total — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.