Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica

Costa Rica: Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 0.3421 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
0.3421 ha per square kilometre
Change on year
down 13.0%
World rank
68th
of 151 countries
All-time high
1.36 ha per square kilometre
in 1991
All-time low
0.1692 ha per square kilometre
in 2020
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961–2023

0.250.50.7511.2196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica is 0.3421 ha per square kilometre, measured in 2023.

That represents a change of down 13.0% on the previous year and down 15.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica peaked at 1.36 ha per square kilometre in 1991 and was at its lowest, 0.1692 ha per square kilometre, in 2020.

Costa Rica ranks 68th of 151 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.

Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, year by year

Annual values for Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961 to 2023.
Year ha per square kilometre Change
1961 0.8049 ha per square kilometre
1962 0.8696 ha per square kilometre +8.0%
1963 1.01 ha per square kilometre +16.7%
1964 0.8564 ha per square kilometre -15.6%
1965 1.03 ha per square kilometre +19.8%
1966 0.8461 ha per square kilometre -17.5%
1967 0.7246 ha per square kilometre -14.4%
1968 0.5405 ha per square kilometre -25.4%
1969 0.7442 ha per square kilometre +37.7%
1970 0.5875 ha per square kilometre -21.1%
1971 0.4569 ha per square kilometre -22.2%
1972 0.6953 ha per square kilometre +52.2%
1973 0.5225 ha per square kilometre -24.8%
1974 0.6957 ha per square kilometre +33.1%
1975 0.6957 ha per square kilometre +0.0%
1976 0.54 ha per square kilometre -22.4%
1977 0.4738 ha per square kilometre -12.3%
1978 0.568 ha per square kilometre +19.9%
1979 0.4896 ha per square kilometre -13.8%
1980 0.4309 ha per square kilometre -12.0%
1981 0.4638 ha per square kilometre +7.6%
1982 0.7537 ha per square kilometre +62.5%
1983 0.754 ha per square kilometre +0.0%
1984 0.8476 ha per square kilometre +12.4%
1985 0.8081 ha per square kilometre -4.7%
1986 1.11 ha per square kilometre +36.9%
1987 1.02 ha per square kilometre -7.6%
1988 1.01 ha per square kilometre -1.5%
1989 1.23 ha per square kilometre +22.5%
1990 1.25 ha per square kilometre +1.2%
1991 1.36 ha per square kilometre +9.3%
1992 1.24 ha per square kilometre -9.2%
1993 1.16 ha per square kilometre -6.5%
1994 1.11 ha per square kilometre -3.7%
1995 1.1 ha per square kilometre -1.0%
1996 0.6361 ha per square kilometre -42.3%
1997 0.8648 ha per square kilometre +36.0%
1998 0.7269 ha per square kilometre -15.9%
1999 0.7099 ha per square kilometre -2.3%
2000 0.6037 ha per square kilometre -15.0%
2001 0.4566 ha per square kilometre -24.4%
2002 0.4326 ha per square kilometre -5.3%
2003 0.4083 ha per square kilometre -5.6%
2004 0.3202 ha per square kilometre -21.6%
2005 0.3202 ha per square kilometre +0.0%
2006 0.2749 ha per square kilometre -14.2%
2007 0.2354 ha per square kilometre -14.4%
2008 0.2215 ha per square kilometre -5.9%
2009 0.3375 ha per square kilometre +52.4%
2010 0.3982 ha per square kilometre +18.0%
2011 0.4314 ha per square kilometre +8.3%
2012 0.422 ha per square kilometre -2.2%
2013 0.4059 ha per square kilometre -3.8%
2014 0.4107 ha per square kilometre +1.2%
2015 0.4533 ha per square kilometre +10.4%
2016 0.4229 ha per square kilometre -6.7%
2017 0.3502 ha per square kilometre -17.2%
2018 0.2038 ha per square kilometre -41.8%
2019 0.2392 ha per square kilometre +17.3%
2020 0.1692 ha per square kilometre -29.2%
2021 0.3465 ha per square kilometre +104.8%
2022 0.393 ha per square kilometre +13.4%
2023 0.3421 ha per square kilometre -13.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.8252 ha per square kilometre 0.5405 ha per square kilometre 1.03 ha per square kilometre 9
1970s 0.5725 ha per square kilometre 0.4569 ha per square kilometre 0.6957 ha per square kilometre 10
1980s 0.8425 ha per square kilometre 0.4309 ha per square kilometre 1.23 ha per square kilometre 10
1990s 1.02 ha per square kilometre 0.6361 ha per square kilometre 1.36 ha per square kilometre 10
2000s 0.3611 ha per square kilometre 0.2215 ha per square kilometre 0.6037 ha per square kilometre 10
2010s 0.3738 ha per square kilometre 0.2038 ha per square kilometre 0.4533 ha per square kilometre 10
2020s 0.3127 ha per square kilometre 0.1692 ha per square kilometre 0.393 ha per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Costa Rica

  1. 65 Guinea-Bissau 0.365 ha per square kilometre compare
  2. 66 Belgium 0.3601 ha per square kilometre compare
  3. 67 Ukraine 0.3547 ha per square kilometre compare
  4. 69 Canada 0.3318 ha per square kilometre compare
  5. 70 Dominica 0.3293 ha per square kilometre compare
  6. 71 Portugal 0.3223 ha per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 152 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Costa Rica

All data for Costa Rica →

Frequently asked questions

What is pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica?
Pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica was 0.3421 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
The highest recorded value was 1.36 ha per square kilometre in 1991.
What is the lowest pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
The lowest recorded value was 0.1692 ha per square kilometre in 2020.
How does Costa Rica rank for pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 68th out of 151 countries with data for 2023.
Is pulses, total — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Costa Rica?
Over the last ten years it is down 15.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/pulses-total-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/pulses-total-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/">Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Pulses, Total — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Pulses, Total — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Pulses, Total — Area harvested, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
152 places, 8,573 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Pulses, Total — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.