Pulses, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: Pulses, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate was -36.7 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
-36.7 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 294.1%
World rank
168th
of 173 countries
All-time high
252.51 % change on previous year
in 2004
All-time low
-66.63 % change on previous year
in 1996
Years of data
63
1962–2024

Pulses, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe, 1962–2024

-1000100200300196219932024

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

In 2024, pulses, total — area harvested, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe stood at -36.7 % change on previous year.

The figure is down 294.1% on the previous year and down 72.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, pulses, total — area harvested, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe peaked at 252.51 % change on previous year in 2004 and was at its lowest, -66.63 % change on previous year, in 1996.

Zimbabwe ranks 168th of 173 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Pulses, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe, year by year

Annual values for Pulses, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe, 1962 to 2024.
Year % change on previous year Change
1962 -0.4155 % change on previous year
1963 -1.97 % change on previous year +373.3%
1964 -2.44 % change on previous year +24.1%
1965 16.88 % change on previous year -791.5%
1966 15.27 % change on previous year -9.5%
1967 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1968 0 % change on previous year
1969 0 % change on previous year
1970 -4.29 % change on previous year
1971 4.98 % change on previous year -216.1%
1972 0.237 % change on previous year -95.2%
1973 2.36 % change on previous year +897.6%
1974 4.62 % change on previous year +95.4%
1975 0.2208 % change on previous year -95.2%
1976 2.2 % change on previous year +897.8%
1977 2.37 % change on previous year +7.6%
1978 -10.53 % change on previous year -544.0%
1979 0.2353 % change on previous year -102.2%
1980 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1981 -13.46 % change on previous year
1982 76.93 % change on previous year -671.4%
1983 1.49 % change on previous year -98.1%
1984 0.3021 % change on previous year -79.8%
1985 1.81 % change on previous year +498.2%
1986 1.78 % change on previous year -1.8%
1987 1.74 % change on previous year -1.7%
1988 1.71 % change on previous year -1.7%
1989 0.8427 % change on previous year -50.8%
1990 1.3 % change on previous year +53.7%
1991 0.726 % change on previous year -44.0%
1992 -11.62 % change on previous year -1700.7%
1993 2.3 % change on previous year -119.8%
1994 16.65 % change on previous year +623.5%
1995 -18.51 % change on previous year -211.2%
1996 -66.63 % change on previous year +259.9%
1997 3.46 % change on previous year -105.2%
1998 16.44 % change on previous year +375.7%
1999 -21.71 % change on previous year -232.1%
2000 4.14 % change on previous year -119.1%
2001 1.22 % change on previous year -70.6%
2002 -2.17 % change on previous year -278.3%
2003 3.22 % change on previous year -248.7%
2004 252.51 % change on previous year +7730.5%
2005 -28.27 % change on previous year -111.2%
2006 35.97 % change on previous year -227.2%
2007 10.45 % change on previous year -71.0%
2008 -11.04 % change on previous year -205.7%
2009 -3.6 % change on previous year -67.4%
2010 23.82 % change on previous year -762.3%
2011 -30.01 % change on previous year -226.0%
2012 104.86 % change on previous year -449.4%
2013 19.9 % change on previous year -81.0%
2014 -21.32 % change on previous year -207.1%
2015 10.03 % change on previous year -147.0%
2016 -11.96 % change on previous year -219.2%
2017 3.71 % change on previous year -131.1%
2018 0.6575 % change on previous year -82.3%
2019 61.38 % change on previous year +9235.2%
2020 -2.7 % change on previous year -104.4%
2021 13.04 % change on previous year -582.5%
2022 8.63 % change on previous year -33.8%
2023 18.91 % change on previous year +119.1%
2024 -36.7 % change on previous year -294.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 3.42 % change on previous year -2.44 % change on previous year 16.88 % change on previous year 8
1970s 0.2412 % change on previous year -10.53 % change on previous year 4.98 % change on previous year 10
1980s 7.31 % change on previous year -13.46 % change on previous year 76.93 % change on previous year 10
1990s -7.76 % change on previous year -66.63 % change on previous year 16.65 % change on previous year 10
2000s 26.24 % change on previous year -28.27 % change on previous year 252.51 % change on previous year 10
2010s 16.11 % change on previous year -30.01 % change on previous year 104.86 % change on previous year 10
2020s 0.2345 % change on previous year -36.7 % change on previous year 18.91 % change on previous year 5

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 165 Denmark -26.65 % change on previous year compare
  2. 166 Djibouti -28.69 % change on previous year compare
  3. 167 Zambia -33.56 % change on previous year compare
  4. 169 Lesotho -54 % change on previous year compare
  5. 170 Grenada -56.22 % change on previous year compare
  6. 171 Israel -70.02 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 214 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is pulses, total — area harvested, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe?
Pulses, total — area harvested, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe was -36.7 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest pulses, total — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 252.51 % change on previous year in 2004.
What is the lowest pulses, total — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was -66.63 % change on previous year in 1996.
How does Zimbabwe rank for pulses, total — area harvested, annual growth rate?
Zimbabwe ranks 168th out of 173 countries with data for 2024.
Is pulses, total — area harvested, annual growth rate rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is down 72.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Pulses, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pulses, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/pulses-total-area-harvested-annual-growth-rate/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/pulses-total-area-harvested-annual-growth-rate/zimbabwe/">Pulses, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Pulses, Total — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Pulses, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 12,001 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Pulses, Total — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.