Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Chile
Chile: Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value was 203.73 million 1000 SLC in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
203.73 million 1000 SLC
Change on year
up 10.8%
World rank
1st
of 75 countries
All-time high
203.73 million 1000 SLC
in 2024
All-time low
4.80 million 1000 SLC
in 1973
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Chile, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 SLC.
Analysis
In 2024, plums and sloes — gross production value in Chile stood at 203.73 million 1000 SLC. That is the highest value across all 64 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.8% on the previous year and up 64.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, plums and sloes — gross production value in Chile peaked at 203.73 million 1000 SLC in 2024 and was at its lowest, 4.80 million 1000 SLC, in 1973.
That places Chile 1st out of 75 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Chile, year by year
| Year | 1000 SLC | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 8.79 million 1000 SLC | — |
| 1962 | 8.39 million 1000 SLC | -4.5% |
| 1963 | 9.19 million 1000 SLC | +9.5% |
| 1964 | 9.19 million 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 8.77 million 1000 SLC | -4.6% |
| 1966 | 8.92 million 1000 SLC | +1.7% |
| 1967 | 9.99 million 1000 SLC | +12.0% |
| 1968 | 9.59 million 1000 SLC | -4.0% |
| 1969 | 8.79 million 1000 SLC | -8.3% |
| 1970 | 8.79 million 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 7.99 million 1000 SLC | -9.1% |
| 1972 | 5.99 million 1000 SLC | -25.0% |
| 1973 | 4.80 million 1000 SLC | -20.0% |
| 1974 | 5.03 million 1000 SLC | +5.0% |
| 1975 | 5.27 million 1000 SLC | +4.8% |
| 1976 | 5.55 million 1000 SLC | +5.3% |
| 1977 | 5.91 million 1000 SLC | +6.5% |
| 1978 | 6.35 million 1000 SLC | +7.4% |
| 1979 | 6.39 million 1000 SLC | +0.6% |
| 1980 | 6.79 million 1000 SLC | +6.2% |
| 1981 | 7.27 million 1000 SLC | +7.1% |
| 1982 | 9.07 million 1000 SLC | +24.7% |
| 1983 | 10.39 million 1000 SLC | +14.5% |
| 1984 | 13.79 million 1000 SLC | +32.7% |
| 1985 | 16.78 million 1000 SLC | +21.7% |
| 1986 | 19.98 million 1000 SLC | +19.0% |
| 1987 | 25.57 million 1000 SLC | +28.0% |
| 1988 | 33.97 million 1000 SLC | +32.8% |
| 1989 | 39.36 million 1000 SLC | +15.9% |
| 1990 | 43.96 million 1000 SLC | +11.7% |
| 1991 | 39.96 million 1000 SLC | -9.1% |
| 1992 | 43.96 million 1000 SLC | +10.0% |
| 1993 | 47.95 million 1000 SLC | +9.1% |
| 1994 | 51.95 million 1000 SLC | +8.3% |
| 1995 | 55.94 million 1000 SLC | +7.7% |
| 1996 | 59.94 million 1000 SLC | +7.1% |
| 1997 | 63.46 million 1000 SLC | +5.9% |
| 1998 | 55.86 million 1000 SLC | -12.0% |
| 1999 | 74.61 million 1000 SLC | +33.5% |
| 2000 | 68.73 million 1000 SLC | -7.9% |
| 2001 | 84.12 million 1000 SLC | +22.4% |
| 2002 | 85.91 million 1000 SLC | +2.1% |
| 2003 | 101.90 million 1000 SLC | +18.6% |
| 2004 | 99.90 million 1000 SLC | -2.0% |
| 2005 | 99.90 million 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 97.50 million 1000 SLC | -2.4% |
| 2007 | 99.90 million 1000 SLC | +2.5% |
| 2008 | 93.51 million 1000 SLC | -6.4% |
| 2009 | 118.28 million 1000 SLC | +26.5% |
| 2010 | 124.02 million 1000 SLC | +4.9% |
| 2011 | 125.92 million 1000 SLC | +1.5% |
| 2012 | 124.81 million 1000 SLC | -0.9% |
| 2013 | 124.33 million 1000 SLC | -0.4% |
| 2014 | 123.92 million 1000 SLC | -0.3% |
| 2015 | 124.67 million 1000 SLC | +0.6% |
| 2016 | 141.06 million 1000 SLC | +13.1% |
| 2017 | 142.90 million 1000 SLC | +1.3% |
| 2018 | 143.46 million 1000 SLC | +0.4% |
| 2019 | 177.82 million 1000 SLC | +24.0% |
| 2020 | 169.32 million 1000 SLC | -4.8% |
| 2021 | 173.91 million 1000 SLC | +2.7% |
| 2022 | 178.53 million 1000 SLC | +2.7% |
| 2023 | 183.81 million 1000 SLC | +3.0% |
| 2024 | 203.73 million 1000 SLC | +10.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.07 million 1000 SLC | 8.39 million 1000 SLC | 9.99 million 1000 SLC | 9 |
| 1970s | 6.21 million 1000 SLC | 4.80 million 1000 SLC | 8.79 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1980s | 18.30 million 1000 SLC | 6.79 million 1000 SLC | 39.36 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1990s | 53.76 million 1000 SLC | 39.96 million 1000 SLC | 74.61 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2000s | 94.96 million 1000 SLC | 68.73 million 1000 SLC | 118.28 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2010s | 135.29 million 1000 SLC | 123.92 million 1000 SLC | 177.82 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2020s | 181.86 million 1000 SLC | 169.32 million 1000 SLC | 203.73 million 1000 SLC | 5 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 2 Republic of Korea 97.03 million 1000 SLC compare
- 3 China, mainland 40.77 million 1000 SLC compare
- 4 Lebanon 40.42 million 1000 SLC compare
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 3.45 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 3.45 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is plums and sloes — gross production value in Chile?
- Plums and sloes — gross production value in Chile was 203.73 million 1000 SLC in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 203.73 million 1000 SLC in 2024.
- What is the lowest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.80 million 1000 SLC in 1973.
- How does Chile rank for plums and sloes — gross production value?
- Chile ranks 1st out of 75 countries with data for 2024.
- Is plums and sloes — gross production value rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 64.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.