Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Romania
Romania: Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value was 275,947 1000 Int$ in 2017. ▼ Falling
Latest (2017)
275,947 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 13.3%
World rank
6th
of 88 countries
All-time high
596,647 1000 Int$
in 1969
All-time low
136,843 1000 Int$
in 2002
Years of data
55
1961–2017
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Romania, 1961–2017
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for plums and sloes — gross production value in Romania is 275,947 1000 Int$, measured in 2017.
That represents a change of down 13.3% on the previous year and up 19.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, plums and sloes — gross production value in Romania peaked at 596,647 1000 Int$ in 1969 and was at its lowest, 136,843 1000 Int$, in 2002.
Romania ranks 6th of 88 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 55 years of available data.
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Romania, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 390,611 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 229,790 1000 Int$ | -41.2% |
| 1963 | 411,078 1000 Int$ | +78.9% |
| 1964 | 197,290 1000 Int$ | -52.0% |
| 1965 | 430,925 1000 Int$ | +118.4% |
| 1966 | 519,368 1000 Int$ | +20.5% |
| 1967 | 415,358 1000 Int$ | -20.0% |
| 1968 | 348,747 1000 Int$ | -16.0% |
| 1969 | 596,647 1000 Int$ | +71.1% |
| 1970 | 432,332 1000 Int$ | -27.5% |
| 1971 | 284,927 1000 Int$ | -34.1% |
| 1972 | 471,859 1000 Int$ | +65.6% |
| 1973 | 238,224 1000 Int$ | -49.5% |
| 1974 | 329,310 1000 Int$ | +38.2% |
| 1975 | 256,906 1000 Int$ | -22.0% |
| 1976 | 351,449 1000 Int$ | +36.8% |
| 1977 | 316,435 1000 Int$ | -10.0% |
| 1978 | 373,596 1000 Int$ | +18.1% |
| 1979 | 485,389 1000 Int$ | +29.9% |
| 1980 | 358,856 1000 Int$ | -26.1% |
| 1981 | 274,195 1000 Int$ | -23.6% |
| 1982 | 517,610 1000 Int$ | +88.8% |
| 1983 | 464,556 1000 Int$ | -10.2% |
| 1984 | 543,642 1000 Int$ | +17.0% |
| 1985 | 506,405 1000 Int$ | -6.8% |
| 1986 | 335,474 1000 Int$ | -33.8% |
| 1987 | 335,226 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1988 | 331,319 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 1989 | 306,262 1000 Int$ | -7.6% |
| 1990 | 278,787 1000 Int$ | -9.0% |
| 1993 | 436,475 1000 Int$ | +56.6% |
| 1994 | 239,201 1000 Int$ | -45.2% |
| 1995 | 156,601 1000 Int$ | -34.5% |
| 1996 | 411,199 1000 Int$ | +162.6% |
| 1997 | 304,883 1000 Int$ | -25.9% |
| 1998 | 250,796 1000 Int$ | -17.7% |
| 1999 | 224,058 1000 Int$ | -10.7% |
| 2000 | 340,887 1000 Int$ | +52.1% |
| 2001 | 345,562 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2002 | 136,843 1000 Int$ | -60.4% |
| 2003 | 564,177 1000 Int$ | +312.3% |
| 2004 | 295,078 1000 Int$ | -47.7% |
| 2005 | 385,995 1000 Int$ | +30.8% |
| 2006 | 371,355 1000 Int$ | -3.8% |
| 2007 | 231,111 1000 Int$ | -37.8% |
| 2008 | 294,782 1000 Int$ | +27.5% |
| 2009 | 331,003 1000 Int$ | +12.3% |
| 2010 | 387,562 1000 Int$ | +17.1% |
| 2011 | 355,753 1000 Int$ | -8.2% |
| 2012 | 263,013 1000 Int$ | -26.1% |
| 2013 | 317,835 1000 Int$ | +20.8% |
| 2014 | 307,184 1000 Int$ | -3.4% |
| 2015 | 307,917 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2016 | 318,155 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 2017 | 275,947 1000 Int$ | -13.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 393,313 1000 Int$ | 197,290 1000 Int$ | 596,647 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 354,043 1000 Int$ | 238,224 1000 Int$ | 485,389 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 397,354 1000 Int$ | 274,195 1000 Int$ | 543,642 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 287,750 1000 Int$ | 156,601 1000 Int$ | 436,475 1000 Int$ | 8 |
| 2000s | 329,679 1000 Int$ | 136,843 1000 Int$ | 564,177 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 316,671 1000 Int$ | 263,013 1000 Int$ | 387,562 1000 Int$ | 8 |
Countries ranked near Romania
- 3 Türkiye 233,201 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 USSR 576,800 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 Yugoslav SFR 340,943 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Chile 316,212 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Serbia 240,164 1000 Int$ compare
- 8 Bosnia and Herzegovina 199,213 1000 Int$ compare
- 9 Serbia and Montenegro 193,356 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Romania
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 19.62 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 676.39 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.1768 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4783 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is plums and sloes — gross production value in Romania?
- Plums and sloes — gross production value in Romania was 275,947 1000 Int$ in 2017, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Romania?
- The highest recorded value was 596,647 1000 Int$ in 1969.
- What is the lowest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Romania?
- The lowest recorded value was 136,843 1000 Int$ in 2002.
- How does Romania rank for plums and sloes — gross production value?
- Romania ranks 6th out of 88 countries with data for 2017.
- Is plums and sloes — gross production value rising or falling in Romania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 19.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Romania data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.