Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Japan
Japan: Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value was 10,172 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
10,172 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 4.1%
World rank
46th
of 88 countries
All-time high
84,473 1000 Int$
in 1997
All-time low
10,172 1000 Int$
in 2024
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Japan, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for plums and sloes — gross production value in Japan is 10,172 1000 Int$, measured in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 64 years on record.
The figure is down 4.1% on the previous year and down 26.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, plums and sloes — gross production value in Japan peaked at 84,473 1000 Int$ in 1997 and was at its lowest, 10,172 1000 Int$, in 2024.
Japan ranks 46th of 88 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Japan, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 30,887 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 27,476 1000 Int$ | -11.0% |
| 1963 | 31,569 1000 Int$ | +14.9% |
| 1964 | 19,785 1000 Int$ | -37.3% |
| 1965 | 23,134 1000 Int$ | +16.9% |
| 1966 | 30,825 1000 Int$ | +33.2% |
| 1967 | 38,205 1000 Int$ | +23.9% |
| 1968 | 41,740 1000 Int$ | +9.3% |
| 1969 | 19,599 1000 Int$ | -53.0% |
| 1970 | 41,927 1000 Int$ | +113.9% |
| 1971 | 35,724 1000 Int$ | -14.8% |
| 1972 | 22,700 1000 Int$ | -36.5% |
| 1973 | 37,337 1000 Int$ | +64.5% |
| 1974 | 44,842 1000 Int$ | +20.1% |
| 1975 | 38,763 1000 Int$ | -13.6% |
| 1976 | 35,414 1000 Int$ | -8.6% |
| 1977 | 42,113 1000 Int$ | +18.9% |
| 1978 | 39,198 1000 Int$ | -6.9% |
| 1979 | 36,096 1000 Int$ | -7.9% |
| 1980 | 39,694 1000 Int$ | +10.0% |
| 1981 | 32,871 1000 Int$ | -17.2% |
| 1982 | 40,872 1000 Int$ | +24.3% |
| 1983 | 41,678 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1984 | 48,501 1000 Int$ | +16.4% |
| 1985 | 49,431 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1986 | 55,323 1000 Int$ | +11.9% |
| 1987 | 41,430 1000 Int$ | -25.1% |
| 1988 | 41,989 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1989 | 41,182 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 1990 | 60,223 1000 Int$ | +46.2% |
| 1991 | 58,610 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 1992 | 50,796 1000 Int$ | -13.3% |
| 1993 | 59,851 1000 Int$ | +17.8% |
| 1994 | 69,960 1000 Int$ | +16.9% |
| 1995 | 75,108 1000 Int$ | +7.4% |
| 1996 | 63,448 1000 Int$ | -15.5% |
| 1997 | 84,473 1000 Int$ | +33.1% |
| 1998 | 59,293 1000 Int$ | -29.8% |
| 1999 | 14,389 1000 Int$ | -75.7% |
| 2000 | 16,498 1000 Int$ | +14.7% |
| 2001 | 18,048 1000 Int$ | +9.4% |
| 2002 | 17,986 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2003 | 14,017 1000 Int$ | -22.1% |
| 2004 | 16,808 1000 Int$ | +19.9% |
| 2005 | 16,622 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 2006 | 13,273 1000 Int$ | -20.1% |
| 2007 | 13,583 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2008 | 16,126 1000 Int$ | +18.7% |
| 2009 | 12,962 1000 Int$ | -19.6% |
| 2010 | 12,962 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 13,955 1000 Int$ | +7.7% |
| 2012 | 13,831 1000 Int$ | -0.9% |
| 2013 | 13,521 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 2014 | 13,831 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2015 | 13,211 1000 Int$ | -4.5% |
| 2016 | 14,265 1000 Int$ | +8.0% |
| 2017 | 12,156 1000 Int$ | -14.8% |
| 2018 | 14,327 1000 Int$ | +17.9% |
| 2019 | 11,226 1000 Int$ | -21.6% |
| 2020 | 10,234 1000 Int$ | -8.8% |
| 2021 | 11,660 1000 Int$ | +13.9% |
| 2022 | 11,660 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 10,606 1000 Int$ | -9.0% |
| 2024 | 10,172 1000 Int$ | -4.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 29,247 1000 Int$ | 19,599 1000 Int$ | 41,740 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 37,411 1000 Int$ | 22,700 1000 Int$ | 44,842 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 43,297 1000 Int$ | 32,871 1000 Int$ | 55,323 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 59,615 1000 Int$ | 14,389 1000 Int$ | 84,473 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 15,592 1000 Int$ | 12,962 1000 Int$ | 18,048 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 13,328 1000 Int$ | 11,226 1000 Int$ | 14,327 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 10,866 1000 Int$ | 10,172 1000 Int$ | 11,660 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Japan
More agriculture & rural data for Japan
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.95 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0096 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 323.87 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.89 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.077 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.0% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.0% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.6% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is plums and sloes — gross production value in Japan?
- Plums and sloes — gross production value in Japan was 10,172 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Japan?
- The highest recorded value was 84,473 1000 Int$ in 1997.
- What is the lowest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Japan?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,172 1000 Int$ in 2024.
- How does Japan rank for plums and sloes — gross production value?
- Japan ranks 46th out of 88 countries with data for 2024.
- Is plums and sloes — gross production value rising or falling in Japan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 26.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Japan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.