Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Italy
Italy: Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value was 128,363 1000 Int$ in 2017. ▲ Rising
Latest (2017)
128,363 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 6.2%
World rank
12th
of 88 countries
All-time high
136,899 1000 Int$
in 2016
All-time low
64,672 1000 Int$
in 1995
Years of data
57
1961–2017
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Italy, 1961–2017
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Italy recorded 128,363 1000 Int$ for plums and sloes — gross production value in 2017.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.2% on the previous year and up 16.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, plums and sloes — gross production value in Italy peaked at 136,899 1000 Int$ in 2016 and was at its lowest, 64,672 1000 Int$, in 1995.
That places Italy 12th out of 88 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 57 years of available data.
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Italy, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 73,682 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 66,673 1000 Int$ | -9.5% |
| 1963 | 77,589 1000 Int$ | +16.4% |
| 1964 | 75,108 1000 Int$ | -3.2% |
| 1965 | 85,280 1000 Int$ | +13.5% |
| 1966 | 86,830 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1967 | 87,822 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1968 | 83,357 1000 Int$ | -5.1% |
| 1969 | 85,093 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1970 | 85,218 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1971 | 90,179 1000 Int$ | +5.8% |
| 1972 | 93,963 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1973 | 79,325 1000 Int$ | -15.6% |
| 1974 | 82,054 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1975 | 85,714 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1976 | 106,305 1000 Int$ | +24.0% |
| 1977 | 83,977 1000 Int$ | -21.0% |
| 1978 | 89,373 1000 Int$ | +6.4% |
| 1979 | 96,319 1000 Int$ | +7.8% |
| 1980 | 109,902 1000 Int$ | +14.1% |
| 1981 | 101,715 1000 Int$ | -7.4% |
| 1982 | 105,499 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1983 | 104,072 1000 Int$ | -1.4% |
| 1984 | 100,351 1000 Int$ | -3.6% |
| 1985 | 97,498 1000 Int$ | -2.8% |
| 1986 | 90,508 1000 Int$ | -7.2% |
| 1987 | 91,680 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1988 | 95,488 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1989 | 82,557 1000 Int$ | -13.5% |
| 1990 | 86,334 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 1991 | 74,649 1000 Int$ | -13.5% |
| 1992 | 94,900 1000 Int$ | +27.1% |
| 1993 | 80,751 1000 Int$ | -14.9% |
| 1994 | 94,779 1000 Int$ | +17.4% |
| 1995 | 64,672 1000 Int$ | -31.8% |
| 1996 | 112,311 1000 Int$ | +73.7% |
| 1997 | 70,976 1000 Int$ | -36.8% |
| 1998 | 92,318 1000 Int$ | +30.1% |
| 1999 | 117,407 1000 Int$ | +27.2% |
| 2000 | 111,535 1000 Int$ | -5.0% |
| 2001 | 106,677 1000 Int$ | -4.4% |
| 2002 | 109,778 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 2003 | 79,387 1000 Int$ | -27.7% |
| 2004 | 111,226 1000 Int$ | +40.1% |
| 2005 | 114,990 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 2006 | 111,941 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 2007 | 110,580 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 2008 | 114,092 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 2009 | 117,409 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 2010 | 128,693 1000 Int$ | +9.6% |
| 2011 | 119,074 1000 Int$ | -7.5% |
| 2012 | 106,830 1000 Int$ | -10.3% |
| 2013 | 130,492 1000 Int$ | +22.1% |
| 2014 | 133,272 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 2015 | 124,020 1000 Int$ | -6.9% |
| 2016 | 136,899 1000 Int$ | +10.4% |
| 2017 | 128,363 1000 Int$ | -6.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 80,159 1000 Int$ | 66,673 1000 Int$ | 87,822 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 89,243 1000 Int$ | 79,325 1000 Int$ | 106,305 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 97,927 1000 Int$ | 82,557 1000 Int$ | 109,902 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 88,910 1000 Int$ | 64,672 1000 Int$ | 117,407 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 108,762 1000 Int$ | 79,387 1000 Int$ | 117,409 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 125,955 1000 Int$ | 106,830 1000 Int$ | 136,899 1000 Int$ | 8 |
Countries ranked near Italy
- 9 Serbia and Montenegro 193,356 1000 Int$ compare
- 10 Morocco 148,680 1000 Int$ compare
- 11 France 130,953 1000 Int$ compare
- 13 Uzbekistan 123,947 1000 Int$ compare
- 14 Russian Federation 111,340 1000 Int$ compare
- 15 Argentina 107,825 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Italy
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.12 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0207 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 894.54 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.3131 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3032 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.1% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.5% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is plums and sloes — gross production value in Italy?
- Plums and sloes — gross production value in Italy was 128,363 1000 Int$ in 2017, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Italy?
- The highest recorded value was 136,899 1000 Int$ in 2016.
- What is the lowest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Italy?
- The lowest recorded value was 64,672 1000 Int$ in 1995.
- How does Italy rank for plums and sloes — gross production value?
- Italy ranks 12th out of 88 countries with data for 2017.
- Is plums and sloes — gross production value rising or falling in Italy?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Italy data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.