Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Hungary
Hungary: Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value was 26,852 1000 Int$ in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2017)
26,852 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 9.0%
World rank
30th
of 88 countries
All-time high
201,756 1000 Int$
in 1961
All-time low
19,085 1000 Int$
in 2007
Years of data
57
1961–2017
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Hungary, 1961–2017
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2017, plums and sloes — gross production value in Hungary stood at 26,852 1000 Int$.
That represents a change of down 9.0% on the previous year and up 40.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, plums and sloes — gross production value in Hungary peaked at 201,756 1000 Int$ in 1961 and was at its lowest, 19,085 1000 Int$, in 2007.
Hungary ranks 30th of 88 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Hungary, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 201,756 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 133,036 1000 Int$ | -34.1% |
| 1963 | 119,205 1000 Int$ | -10.4% |
| 1964 | 150,216 1000 Int$ | +26.0% |
| 1965 | 150,468 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 1966 | 161,500 1000 Int$ | +7.3% |
| 1967 | 126,975 1000 Int$ | -21.4% |
| 1968 | 115,902 1000 Int$ | -8.7% |
| 1969 | 143,107 1000 Int$ | +23.5% |
| 1970 | 140,498 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 1971 | 118,331 1000 Int$ | -15.8% |
| 1972 | 155,879 1000 Int$ | +31.7% |
| 1973 | 140,812 1000 Int$ | -9.7% |
| 1974 | 134,696 1000 Int$ | -4.3% |
| 1975 | 96,458 1000 Int$ | -28.4% |
| 1976 | 94,484 1000 Int$ | -2.0% |
| 1977 | 98,620 1000 Int$ | +4.4% |
| 1978 | 139,829 1000 Int$ | +41.8% |
| 1979 | 72,131 1000 Int$ | -48.4% |
| 1980 | 136,893 1000 Int$ | +89.8% |
| 1981 | 93,842 1000 Int$ | -31.4% |
| 1982 | 121,230 1000 Int$ | +29.2% |
| 1983 | 106,211 1000 Int$ | -12.4% |
| 1984 | 101,090 1000 Int$ | -4.8% |
| 1985 | 101,840 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 1986 | 120,444 1000 Int$ | +18.3% |
| 1987 | 137,794 1000 Int$ | +14.4% |
| 1988 | 113,149 1000 Int$ | -17.9% |
| 1989 | 111,022 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 1990 | 94,470 1000 Int$ | -14.9% |
| 1991 | 86,998 1000 Int$ | -7.9% |
| 1992 | 88,071 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1993 | 76,513 1000 Int$ | -13.1% |
| 1994 | 72,142 1000 Int$ | -5.7% |
| 1995 | 65,061 1000 Int$ | -9.8% |
| 1996 | 70,976 1000 Int$ | +9.1% |
| 1997 | 76,159 1000 Int$ | +7.3% |
| 1998 | 64,364 1000 Int$ | -15.5% |
| 1999 | 60,676 1000 Int$ | -5.7% |
| 2000 | 56,616 1000 Int$ | -6.7% |
| 2001 | 55,710 1000 Int$ | -1.6% |
| 2002 | 30,587 1000 Int$ | -45.1% |
| 2003 | 28,176 1000 Int$ | -7.9% |
| 2004 | 41,551 1000 Int$ | +47.5% |
| 2005 | 22,300 1000 Int$ | -46.3% |
| 2006 | 40,056 1000 Int$ | +79.6% |
| 2007 | 19,085 1000 Int$ | -52.4% |
| 2008 | 34,714 1000 Int$ | +81.9% |
| 2009 | 31,933 1000 Int$ | -8.0% |
| 2010 | 43,945 1000 Int$ | +37.6% |
| 2011 | 23,158 1000 Int$ | -47.3% |
| 2012 | 26,837 1000 Int$ | +15.9% |
| 2013 | 29,770 1000 Int$ | +10.9% |
| 2014 | 27,984 1000 Int$ | -6.0% |
| 2015 | 28,544 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2016 | 29,497 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 2017 | 26,852 1000 Int$ | -9.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 144,685 1000 Int$ | 115,902 1000 Int$ | 201,756 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 119,174 1000 Int$ | 72,131 1000 Int$ | 155,879 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 114,352 1000 Int$ | 93,842 1000 Int$ | 137,794 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 75,543 1000 Int$ | 60,676 1000 Int$ | 94,470 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 36,073 1000 Int$ | 19,085 1000 Int$ | 56,616 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 29,573 1000 Int$ | 23,158 1000 Int$ | 43,945 1000 Int$ | 8 |
Countries ranked near Hungary
- 27 Egypt 30,432 1000 Int$ compare
- 28 Afghanistan 30,078 1000 Int$ compare
- 29 Azerbaijan 27,740 1000 Int$ compare
- 31 Albania 24,930 1000 Int$ compare
- 32 Czechoslovakia 22,328 1000 Int$ compare
- 33 Turkmenistan 21,119 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Hungary
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 8.23 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0265 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 687.58 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2931 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is plums and sloes — gross production value in Hungary?
- Plums and sloes — gross production value in Hungary was 26,852 1000 Int$ in 2017, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Hungary?
- The highest recorded value was 201,756 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- What is the lowest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Hungary?
- The lowest recorded value was 19,085 1000 Int$ in 2007.
- How does Hungary rank for plums and sloes — gross production value?
- Hungary ranks 30th out of 88 countries with data for 2017.
- Is plums and sloes — gross production value rising or falling in Hungary?
- Over the last ten years it is up 40.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Hungary data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.