Pepper — Import quantity in Kiribati
Kiribati: Pepper — Import quantity was 0 1000 t in 2023. ▬ Flat
Pepper — Import quantity in Kiribati, 2010–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.
Analysis
In 2023, pepper — import quantity in Kiribati stood at 0 1000 t. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.
Over the whole period, pepper — import quantity in Kiribati peaked at 0 1000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2010.
Kiribati ranks 75th of 180 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kiribati
- 75 Nauru 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Bhutan 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Timor-Leste 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Lesotho 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Comoros 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Djibouti 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Tajikistan 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Micronesia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Liberia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Gambia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Albania 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Armenia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
- 75 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Eswatini 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
- 75 North Macedonia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Angola 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Niger 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
- 75 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Congo 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Slovakia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Chile 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Serbia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Panama 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Belize 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
- 75 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Madagascar 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Mozambique 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Malta 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Syrian Arab Republic 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Ethiopia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
- 75 United Republic of Tanzania 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
- 75 Melanesia 0 1000 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Kiribati
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 23.2% (2024)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 23.17 (2024)
- Agriculture share gdp 23.17 (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.0% (2021)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.3% (2021)
- Rural population 36.6% (2025)
- Rural population growth -1.0% (2025)
- Rural population 49,975 (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 79.49 million current US$ (2024)
- Aquaculture farmed fish production 8 (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pepper — import quantity in Kiribati?
- Pepper — import quantity in Kiribati was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest pepper — import quantity recorded in Kiribati?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
- What is the lowest pepper — import quantity recorded in Kiribati?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
- How does Kiribati rank for pepper — import quantity?
- Kiribati ranks 75th out of 180 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Kiribati data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Pepper — Import quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.