Peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Paraguay
Paraguay: Peas, dry — Gross Production Value was 1,862 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
1,862 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 0.1%
World rank
59th
of 97 countries
All-time high
1,912 1000 Int$
in 2015
All-time low
469 1000 Int$
in 1986
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Paraguay, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Paraguay recorded 1,862 1000 Int$ for peas, dry — gross production value in 2024.
The figure is down 0.1% on the previous year and up 3.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, peas, dry — gross production value in Paraguay peaked at 1,912 1000 Int$ in 2015 and was at its lowest, 469 1000 Int$, in 1986.
That places Paraguay 59th out of 97 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Paraguay, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 713 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 713 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 733 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1964 | 713 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 1965 | 753 1000 Int$ | +5.6% |
| 1966 | 784 1000 Int$ | +4.1% |
| 1967 | 893 1000 Int$ | +13.9% |
| 1968 | 950 1000 Int$ | +6.4% |
| 1969 | 876 1000 Int$ | -7.8% |
| 1970 | 882 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 1971 | 1,290 1000 Int$ | +46.3% |
| 1972 | 679 1000 Int$ | -47.4% |
| 1973 | 882 1000 Int$ | +29.9% |
| 1974 | 992 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1975 | 1,022 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 1976 | 1,042 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1977 | 1,178 1000 Int$ | +13.1% |
| 1978 | 1,218 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1979 | 1,271 1000 Int$ | +4.4% |
| 1980 | 1,324 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1981 | 543 1000 Int$ | -59.0% |
| 1982 | 611 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1983 | 577 1000 Int$ | -5.6% |
| 1984 | 611 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 1985 | 617 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1986 | 469 1000 Int$ | -24.0% |
| 1987 | 645 1000 Int$ | +37.5% |
| 1988 | 620 1000 Int$ | -3.9% |
| 1989 | 600 1000 Int$ | -3.2% |
| 1990 | 506 1000 Int$ | -15.7% |
| 1991 | 514 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1992 | 506 1000 Int$ | -1.6% |
| 1993 | 526 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 1994 | 530 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 1995 | 516 1000 Int$ | -2.6% |
| 1996 | 492 1000 Int$ | -4.7% |
| 1997 | 516 1000 Int$ | +4.9% |
| 1998 | 977 1000 Int$ | +89.3% |
| 1999 | 1,367 1000 Int$ | +39.9% |
| 2000 | 1,022 1000 Int$ | -25.2% |
| 2001 | 1,040 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2002 | 988 1000 Int$ | -5.0% |
| 2003 | 841 1000 Int$ | -14.9% |
| 2004 | 1,578 1000 Int$ | +87.6% |
| 2005 | 1,833 1000 Int$ | +16.2% |
| 2006 | 1,293 1000 Int$ | -29.5% |
| 2007 | 1,358 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 2008 | 1,472 1000 Int$ | +8.4% |
| 2009 | 1,493 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2010 | 1,593 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 2011 | 1,712 1000 Int$ | +7.5% |
| 2012 | 1,684 1000 Int$ | -1.6% |
| 2013 | 1,730 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 2014 | 1,805 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 2015 | 1,912 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 2016 | 1,816 1000 Int$ | -5.0% |
| 2017 | 1,811 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2018 | 1,888 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 2019 | 1,838 1000 Int$ | -2.6% |
| 2020 | 1,870 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 2021 | 1,865 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2022 | 1,858 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 2023 | 1,864 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 2024 | 1,862 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 792 1000 Int$ | 713 1000 Int$ | 950 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 1,046 1000 Int$ | 679 1000 Int$ | 1,290 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 661.7 1000 Int$ | 469 1000 Int$ | 1,324 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 645 1000 Int$ | 492 1000 Int$ | 1,367 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 1,292 1000 Int$ | 841 1000 Int$ | 1,833 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,779 1000 Int$ | 1,593 1000 Int$ | 1,912 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,864 1000 Int$ | 1,858 1000 Int$ | 1,870 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Paraguay
- 56 Bangladesh 2,713 1000 Int$ compare
- 57 Congo 2,372 1000 Int$ compare
- 58 Libya 2,041 1000 Int$ compare
- 60 Tunisia 1,786 1000 Int$ compare
- 61 Switzerland 1,760 1000 Int$ compare
- 62 Sierra Leone 1,274 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Paraguay
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 14.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1164 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 817.98 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5603 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2961 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 11.64 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 11.64 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is peas, dry — gross production value in Paraguay?
- Peas, dry — gross production value in Paraguay was 1,862 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest peas, dry — gross production value recorded in Paraguay?
- The highest recorded value was 1,912 1000 Int$ in 2015.
- What is the lowest peas, dry — gross production value recorded in Paraguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 469 1000 Int$ in 1986.
- How does Paraguay rank for peas, dry — gross production value?
- Paraguay ranks 59th out of 97 countries with data for 2024.
- Is peas, dry — gross production value rising or falling in Paraguay?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Paraguay data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Peas, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.