Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Denmark
Denmark: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 0.3794 ha per square kilometre in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Denmark, 1961–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
Denmark recorded 0.3794 ha per square kilometre for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre in 2017. That is the highest value across all 57 years on record.
The figure is up 39.2% on the previous year and up 911.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre in Denmark peaked at 0.3794 ha per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0.01 ha per square kilometre, in 2000.
That places Denmark 16th out of 104 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Denmark, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.025 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.02 ha per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1963 | 0.02 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.02 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0175 ha per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1966 | 0.0125 ha per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 1967 | 0.025 ha per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0325 ha per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0503 ha per square kilometre | +54.6% |
| 1970 | 0.1082 ha per square kilometre | +115.4% |
| 1971 | 0.1275 ha per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 1972 | 0.0755 ha per square kilometre | -40.8% |
| 1973 | 0.0413 ha per square kilometre | -45.4% |
| 1974 | 0.0432 ha per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1975 | 0.0386 ha per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 1976 | 0.0351 ha per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0472 ha per square kilometre | +34.5% |
| 1978 | 0.059 ha per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1979 | 0.0326 ha per square kilometre | -44.8% |
| 1980 | 0.028 ha per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1981 | 0.0259 ha per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 1982 | 0.0875 ha per square kilometre | +238.5% |
| 1983 | 0.05 ha per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 1984 | 0.1875 ha per square kilometre | +275.0% |
| 1985 | 0.1003 ha per square kilometre | -46.5% |
| 1986 | 0.2399 ha per square kilometre | +139.0% |
| 1987 | 0.1132 ha per square kilometre | -52.8% |
| 1988 | 0.0783 ha per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 1989 | 0.0927 ha per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1990 | 0.0468 ha per square kilometre | -49.5% |
| 1991 | 0.031 ha per square kilometre | -33.8% |
| 1992 | 0.0199 ha per square kilometre | -35.9% |
| 1993 | 0.0199 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0125 ha per square kilometre | -37.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0125 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.015 ha per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1997 | 0.015 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.015 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0125 ha per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 2000 | 0.01 ha per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0125 ha per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2002 | 0.07 ha per square kilometre | +460.0% |
| 2003 | 0.1225 ha per square kilometre | +75.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0925 ha per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 2005 | 0.075 ha per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 2006 | 0.0525 ha per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0375 ha per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 2008 | 0.0275 ha per square kilometre | -26.7% |
| 2009 | 0.03 ha per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2010 | 0.0425 ha per square kilometre | +41.7% |
| 2011 | 0.0475 ha per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2012 | 0.06 ha per square kilometre | +26.3% |
| 2013 | 0.0727 ha per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 2014 | 0.105 ha per square kilometre | +44.4% |
| 2015 | 0.18 ha per square kilometre | +71.4% |
| 2016 | 0.2725 ha per square kilometre | +51.4% |
| 2017 | 0.3794 ha per square kilometre | +39.2% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Denmark changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | +460.0% | 0.0125 ha per square kilometre | 0.07 ha per square kilometre |
| 1984 | +275.0% | 0.05 ha per square kilometre | 0.1875 ha per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0248 ha per square kilometre | 0.0125 ha per square kilometre | 0.0503 ha per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0608 ha per square kilometre | 0.0326 ha per square kilometre | 0.1275 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1003 ha per square kilometre | 0.0259 ha per square kilometre | 0.2399 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.02 ha per square kilometre | 0.0125 ha per square kilometre | 0.0468 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.053 ha per square kilometre | 0.01 ha per square kilometre | 0.1225 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.145 ha per square kilometre | 0.0425 ha per square kilometre | 0.3794 ha per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Denmark
More agriculture & rural data for Denmark
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 37.33 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0117 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 900.07 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.7939 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1115 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.2% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.2% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.9% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre in Denmark?
- Other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre in Denmark was 0.3794 ha per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Denmark?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3794 ha per square kilometre in 2017.
- What is the lowest other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Denmark?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.01 ha per square kilometre in 2000.
- How does Denmark rank for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Denmark ranks 16th out of 104 countries with data for 2017.
- Is other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Denmark?
- Over the last ten years it is up 911.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Denmark data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.