Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Barbados
Barbados: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 1.47 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Barbados, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
Barbados recorded 1.47 ha per square kilometre for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre in 2023.
The figure is down 0.2% on the previous year and down 9.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre in Barbados peaked at 1.74 ha per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.9302 ha per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Barbados 4th out of 104 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Barbados, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.9302 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.9302 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.9302 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.9302 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.9302 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.9302 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 1 ha per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1968 | 1.12 ha per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 1969 | 1.23 ha per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1970 | 1.28 ha per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1971 | 1.35 ha per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1972 | 1.4 ha per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1973 | 1.4 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 1.4 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 1.4 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 1.4 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 1.42 ha per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1978 | 1.47 ha per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1979 | 1.47 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 1.49 ha per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1981 | 1.49 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 1.51 ha per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1983 | 1.53 ha per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1984 | 1.53 ha per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1985 | 1.53 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 1.53 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 1.56 ha per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1988 | 1.56 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 1.56 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 1.58 ha per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1991 | 1.58 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.56 ha per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1993 | 1.56 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1.56 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1.56 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.56 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.56 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.56 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.43 ha per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2000 | 1.43 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1.43 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1.44 ha per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2003 | 1.47 ha per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2004 | 1.51 ha per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2005 | 1.56 ha per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2006 | 1.63 ha per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2007 | 1.67 ha per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2008 | 1.74 ha per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2009 | 1.63 ha per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2010 | 1.53 ha per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 2011 | 1.49 ha per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2012 | 1.58 ha per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2013 | 1.63 ha per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2014 | 1.6 ha per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2015 | 1.57 ha per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2016 | 1.53 ha per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2017 | 1.5 ha per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2018 | 1.48 ha per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2019 | 1.48 ha per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2020 | 1.47 ha per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2021 | 1.47 ha per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2022 | 1.47 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1.47 ha per square kilometre | -0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9922 ha per square kilometre | 0.9302 ha per square kilometre | 1.23 ha per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.4 ha per square kilometre | 1.28 ha per square kilometre | 1.47 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.53 ha per square kilometre | 1.49 ha per square kilometre | 1.56 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.55 ha per square kilometre | 1.43 ha per square kilometre | 1.58 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.55 ha per square kilometre | 1.43 ha per square kilometre | 1.74 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.54 ha per square kilometre | 1.48 ha per square kilometre | 1.63 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.47 ha per square kilometre | 1.47 ha per square kilometre | 1.47 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Barbados
- 1 Comoros 7.31 ha per square kilometre compare
- 2 Bangladesh 2.74 ha per square kilometre compare
- 3 Sierra Leone 1.65 ha per square kilometre compare
- 5 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1.31 ha per square kilometre compare
- 6 Ghana 1.23 ha per square kilometre compare
- 7 Gambia 1.16 ha per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Barbados
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0155 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 418.19 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.3404 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.403 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.6% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.9% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre in Barbados?
- Other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre in Barbados was 1.47 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Barbados?
- The highest recorded value was 1.74 ha per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Barbados?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.9302 ha per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Barbados rank for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Barbados ranks 4th out of 104 countries with data for 2023.
- Is other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Barbados?
- Over the last ten years it is down 9.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Barbados data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.