Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP in Romania
Romania: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP in Romania, 1987–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2017, other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp in Romania stood at 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That represents a change of up 21.6% on the previous year and up 8.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp in Romania peaked at 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1987 and was at its lowest, 0 t per US$ of GDP, in 2008.
Romania ranks 100th of 139 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP in Romania, year by year
| Year | t per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1987 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1988 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -20.2% |
| 1989 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +1.0% |
| 1990 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 1991 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -24.6% |
| 1992 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +71.9% |
| 1993 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +12.4% |
| 1994 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -43.7% |
| 1995 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -29.4% |
| 1996 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +47.0% |
| 1997 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 1998 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 1999 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +9.0% |
| 2000 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +6.3% |
| 2001 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 2002 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -38.3% |
| 2003 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +54.0% |
| 2004 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -82.1% |
| 2005 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +170.8% |
| 2006 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -65.3% |
| 2007 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +18.5% |
| 2008 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -20.4% |
| 2009 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +51.6% |
| 2010 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -25.3% |
| 2011 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +15.7% |
| 2012 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2013 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 2014 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +5.9% |
| 2015 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 2016 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 2017 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +21.6% |
Romania compared with similar countries
- Romania's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 3.3× the median. (40 countries reporting)
- Romania's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 1.7× the median. (31 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP in Romania changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | +170.8% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 3 |
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 8 |
Countries ranked near Romania
More agriculture & rural data for Romania
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 19.62 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 676.39 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.1768 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4783 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp in Romania?
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp in Romania was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Romania?
- The highest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1987.
- What is the lowest other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Romania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2008.
- How does Romania rank for other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp?
- Romania ranks 100th out of 139 countries with data for 2017.
- Is other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Romania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Romania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.