Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP in Finland
Finland: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1984. ▼ Falling
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP in Finland, 1961–1984
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp in Finland is 0 t per US$ of GDP, measured in 1984.
That represents a change of down 4.3% on the previous year and down 45.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp in Finland peaked at 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1967 and was at its lowest, 0 t per US$ of GDP, in 1973.
That places Finland 50th out of 139 countries with data for 1984, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP in Finland, year by year
| Year | t per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 1963 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 1964 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -25.3% |
| 1965 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -15.2% |
| 1966 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +24.4% |
| 1967 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +99.0% |
| 1968 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -58.0% |
| 1969 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +4.0% |
| 1970 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +13.2% |
| 1971 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -24.4% |
| 1972 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 1973 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -49.5% |
| 1974 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +252.6% |
| 1975 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 1976 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 1977 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 1978 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +15.9% |
| 1979 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -22.9% |
| 1980 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -16.8% |
| 1981 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 1982 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 1983 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +3.8% |
| 1984 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
Finland compared with similar countries
- Finland's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 31.8× the median. (40 countries reporting)
- Finland's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 16.5× the median. (31 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP in Finland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1974 | +252.6% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
| 1967 | +99.0% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 47 Tonga 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 48 Cambodia 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 49 Dominica 0 t per US$ of GDP
- 51 Saint Lucia 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 52 Egypt 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 53 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 t per US$ of GDP
More agriculture & rural data for Finland
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.33 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0261 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,466 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5476 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2548 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 7.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp in Finland?
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp in Finland was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1984, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1967.
- What is the lowest other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1973.
- How does Finland rank for other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp?
- Finland ranks 50th out of 139 countries with data for 1984.
- Is other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 45.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.