Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP in Burundi
Burundi: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP in Burundi, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp in Burundi is 0 t per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 13.2% on the previous year and down 5.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp in Burundi peaked at 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP in 1966 and was at its lowest, 0 t per US$ of GDP, in 2022.
Burundi ranks 2nd of 139 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP in Burundi, year by year
| Year | t per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 1963 | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1964 | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 1965 | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP | +67.9% |
| 1966 | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 1967 | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1968 | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 1969 | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 1970 | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | -21.6% |
| 1971 | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | +1.1% |
| 1972 | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | +5.2% |
| 1973 | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 1974 | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 1976 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -15.5% |
| 1978 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 1979 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -20.8% |
| 1980 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 1981 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 1982 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +11.3% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -8.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 1987 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +10.3% |
| 1988 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +7.1% |
| 1989 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 1990 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +0.7% |
| 1991 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 1992 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +10.2% |
| 1993 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +12.8% |
| 1994 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 1996 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +12.5% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1998 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +7.6% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +9.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -7.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +0.5% |
| 2002 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +8.7% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +8.8% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 2005 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -15.5% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -1.6% |
| 2008 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 2009 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | +8.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -25.6% |
| 2011 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 2012 | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 2013 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 2014 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 2015 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 2016 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +6.8% |
| 2017 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 2018 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 2019 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
| 2020 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 2021 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2022 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 2023 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +18.2% |
| 2024 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +13.2% |
Burundi compared with similar countries
- Burundi's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for low income countries, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 7.7× the median. (19 countries reporting)
- Burundi's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 18.5× the median. (39 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP in Burundi changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1965 | +67.9% | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Burundi
- 1 Burkina Faso 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 3 Papua New Guinea 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 4 Malawi 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 5 Myanmar 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
More agriculture & rural data for Burundi
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 8.36 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.3429 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 80.18 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.27 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0032 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.7431 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 34.3% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 34.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.5% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.0% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp in Burundi?
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp in Burundi was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Burundi?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP in 1966.
- What is the lowest other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Burundi?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2022.
- How does Burundi rank for other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp?
- Burundi ranks 2nd out of 139 countries with data for 2024.
- Is other fruits, n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Burundi?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Burundi data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.