Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Tunisia
Tunisia: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 0.2238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Tunisia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Tunisia stood at 0.2238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 0.7% on the previous year and up 21.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Tunisia peaked at 0.2255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
Tunisia ranks 50th of 139 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0552 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0508 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0662 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 1964 | 0.0548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 1965 | 0.0501 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 1966 | 0.0404 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -19.3% |
| 1967 | 0.0425 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1968 | 0.0486 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1969 | 0.0466 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0422 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1971 | 0.0408 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1972 | 0.0466 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1973 | 0.0455 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1974 | 0.0535 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0444 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0378 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1977 | 0.0411 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1978 | 0.0463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1979 | 0.045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -41.7% |
| 1981 | 0.0441 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +68.4% |
| 1982 | 0.0552 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0651 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0731 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1985 | 0.088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 1986 | 0.0946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1987 | 0.0971 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1988 | 0.1142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1989 | 0.117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1990 | 0.112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1991 | 0.1374 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 1992 | 0.131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1993 | 0.1583 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 1994 | 0.1479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1995 | 0.1423 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1996 | 0.1608 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1997 | 0.1746 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1998 | 0.1774 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1999 | 0.1884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2000 | 0.1837 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2001 | 0.163 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2002 | 0.1823 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2003 | 0.1876 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2004 | 0.1903 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2005 | 0.1876 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2006 | 0.1959 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2007 | 0.1945 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2008 | 0.2069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2009 | 0.2069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.1848 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2011 | 0.1986 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2012 | 0.2027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2013 | 0.1848 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2014 | 0.2124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 2015 | 0.2152 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2016 | 0.2234 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2017 | 0.2055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 2018 | 0.2134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2019 | 0.2181 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2020 | 0.221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2021 | 0.2249 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2022 | 0.2255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2023 | 0.2238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's 0.2238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.1866 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 1.2× the median. (38 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's 0.2238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.1064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 2.1× the median. (20 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Tunisia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1981 | +68.4% | 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0441 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0506 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0404 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0662 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0443 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0378 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0535 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0775 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.153 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.163 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1848 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2234 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
- 47 El Salvador 0.2774 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 48 South Sudan 0.2711 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 49 Uzbekistan 0.2263 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 51 Egypt 0.2138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 52 Lesotho 0.2111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 53 Togo 0.2064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Tunisia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 18.22 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1029 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 479.33 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5867 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.293 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 10.3% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 10.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.4% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Tunisia?
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Tunisia was 0.2238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does Tunisia rank for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Tunisia ranks 50th out of 139 countries with data for 2023.
- Is other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 21.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.