Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia
Latvia: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia, 2006–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Latvia recorded 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in 2017.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 31.4% on the previous year and up 53.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia peaked at 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2014 and was at its lowest, 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 2008.
That places Latvia 132nd out of 139 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2007 | 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -40.5% |
| 2008 | 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -76.6% |
| 2009 | 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +527.3% |
| 2010 | 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 2011 | 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -51.7% |
| 2012 | 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +164.3% |
| 2013 | 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +97.5% |
| 2015 | 0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -32.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -35.2% |
| 2017 | 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -31.4% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.0561 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 2% of the median. (39 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.0451 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 3% of the median. (30 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 2010s | 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 129 Libya 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 130 Mauritania 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 131 Ukraine 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 133 Lithuania 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 134 Mongolia 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 135 Bhutan 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Latvia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,055 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3137 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.1% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia?
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia was 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2014.
- What is the lowest other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- How does Latvia rank for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Latvia ranks 132nd out of 139 countries with data for 2017.
- Is other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 53.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.