Oranges — Production, per square kilometre in Congo

Congo: Oranges — Production, per square kilometre was 0.0064 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
0.0064 t per square kilometre
Change on year
down 0.3%
World rank
94th
of 120 countries
All-time high
0.009 t per square kilometre
in 1990
All-time low
0.0058 t per square kilometre
in 2002
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Oranges — Production, per square kilometre in Congo, 1961–2023

00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for oranges — production, per square kilometre in Congo is 0.0064 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023.

That represents a change of down 0.3% on the previous year and down 3.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, oranges — production, per square kilometre in Congo peaked at 0.009 t per square kilometre in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0.0058 t per square kilometre, in 2002.

That places Congo 94th out of 120 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.

Oranges — Production, per square kilometre in Congo, year by year

Annual values for Oranges — Production, per square kilometre in Congo, 1961 to 2023.
Year t per square kilometre Change
1961 0.0059 t per square kilometre
1962 0.0059 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1963 0.0059 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1964 0.0059 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1965 0.0059 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1966 0.0064 t per square kilometre +10.0%
1967 0.0064 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1968 0.0067 t per square kilometre +4.5%
1969 0.0067 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1970 0.007 t per square kilometre +4.3%
1971 0.007 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1972 0.0073 t per square kilometre +4.2%
1973 0.0076 t per square kilometre +4.0%
1974 0.0079 t per square kilometre +3.8%
1975 0.0082 t per square kilometre +3.7%
1976 0.0082 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1977 0.0085 t per square kilometre +3.6%
1978 0.0088 t per square kilometre +3.4%
1979 0.0088 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1980 0.0088 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1981 0.0088 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1982 0.0088 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1983 0.0085 t per square kilometre -3.3%
1984 0.0085 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1985 0.0085 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1986 0.0083 t per square kilometre -1.7%
1987 0.0083 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1988 0.0083 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1989 0.0082 t per square kilometre -1.8%
1990 0.009 t per square kilometre +10.1%
1991 0.0079 t per square kilometre -12.5%
1992 0.0076 t per square kilometre -3.6%
1993 0.0074 t per square kilometre -3.1%
1994 0.0073 t per square kilometre -0.8%
1995 0.0072 t per square kilometre -1.3%
1996 0.0068 t per square kilometre -5.3%
1997 0.007 t per square kilometre +2.7%
1998 0.007 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1999 0.0071 t per square kilometre +0.9%
2000 0.0073 t per square kilometre +2.7%
2001 0.0073 t per square kilometre +0.5%
2002 0.0058 t per square kilometre -20.8%
2003 0.0066 t per square kilometre +13.9%
2004 0.0066 t per square kilometre +0.0%
2005 0.0067 t per square kilometre +2.0%
2006 0.007 t per square kilometre +4.3%
2007 0.0067 t per square kilometre -4.2%
2008 0.0067 t per square kilometre -0.2%
2009 0.007 t per square kilometre +4.6%
2010 0.0067 t per square kilometre -5.0%
2011 0.0066 t per square kilometre -1.0%
2012 0.0066 t per square kilometre +0.2%
2013 0.0066 t per square kilometre -0.4%
2014 0.0065 t per square kilometre -0.8%
2015 0.0065 t per square kilometre -0.0%
2016 0.0065 t per square kilometre -0.6%
2017 0.0065 t per square kilometre -0.8%
2018 0.0064 t per square kilometre -0.4%
2019 0.0064 t per square kilometre -0.8%
2020 0.0064 t per square kilometre -0.3%
2021 0.0064 t per square kilometre +0.5%
2022 0.0064 t per square kilometre +0.2%
2023 0.0064 t per square kilometre -0.3%

Congo compared with similar countries

  • Congo's 0.0064 t per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.4592 t per square kilometre, 1% of the median. (27 countries reporting)
  • Congo's 0.0064 t per square kilometre is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1339 t per square kilometre, 5% of the median. (26 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.0062 t per square kilometre 0.0059 t per square kilometre 0.0067 t per square kilometre 9
1970s 0.0079 t per square kilometre 0.007 t per square kilometre 0.0088 t per square kilometre 10
1980s 0.0085 t per square kilometre 0.0082 t per square kilometre 0.0088 t per square kilometre 10
1990s 0.0074 t per square kilometre 0.0068 t per square kilometre 0.009 t per square kilometre 10
2000s 0.0068 t per square kilometre 0.0058 t per square kilometre 0.0073 t per square kilometre 10
2010s 0.0065 t per square kilometre 0.0064 t per square kilometre 0.0067 t per square kilometre 10
2020s 0.0064 t per square kilometre 0.0064 t per square kilometre 0.0064 t per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Congo

  1. 91 Tajikistan 0.0132 t per square kilometre compare
  2. 92 Afghanistan 0.0127 t per square kilometre compare
  3. 93 Botswana 0.0068 t per square kilometre compare
  4. 95 Zambia 0.0056 t per square kilometre compare
  5. 96 Croatia 0.0055 t per square kilometre compare
  6. 97 Philippines 0.005 t per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 121 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Congo

All data for Congo →

Frequently asked questions

What is oranges — production, per square kilometre in Congo?
Oranges — production, per square kilometre in Congo was 0.0064 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest oranges — production, per square kilometre recorded in Congo?
The highest recorded value was 0.009 t per square kilometre in 1990.
What is the lowest oranges — production, per square kilometre recorded in Congo?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0058 t per square kilometre in 2002.
How does Congo rank for oranges — production, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 94th out of 120 countries with data for 2023.
Is oranges — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Congo?
Over the last ten years it is down 3.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Congo data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Oranges — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oranges — Production, per square kilometre in Congo. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/oranges-production-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/oranges-production-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/">Oranges — Production, per square kilometre in Congo</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Oranges — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Oranges — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
121 places, 5,868 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.