Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value was 118,835 1000 USD in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
118,835 1000 USD
Change on year
up 4.8%
Rank
11th
of 14 groups
All-time high
129,296 1000 USD
in 2006
All-time low
17,894 1000 USD
in 1962
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 USD.
Analysis
The most recent figure for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) is 118,835 1000 USD, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.8% on the previous year and up 1.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) peaked at 129,296 1000 USD in 2006 and was at its lowest, 17,894 1000 USD, in 1962.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), year by year
| Year | 1000 USD | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 18,086 1000 USD | — |
| 1962 | 17,894 1000 USD | -1.1% |
| 1963 | 32,911 1000 USD | +83.9% |
| 1964 | 19,984 1000 USD | -39.3% |
| 1965 | 18,918 1000 USD | -5.3% |
| 1966 | 23,728 1000 USD | +25.4% |
| 1967 | 26,114 1000 USD | +10.1% |
| 1968 | 20,981 1000 USD | -19.7% |
| 1969 | 23,489 1000 USD | +12.0% |
| 1970 | 24,907 1000 USD | +6.0% |
| 1971 | 29,246 1000 USD | +17.4% |
| 1972 | 35,123 1000 USD | +20.1% |
| 1973 | 36,605 1000 USD | +4.2% |
| 1974 | 21,466 1000 USD | -41.4% |
| 1975 | 33,218 1000 USD | +54.7% |
| 1976 | 37,535 1000 USD | +13.0% |
| 1977 | 36,705 1000 USD | -2.2% |
| 1978 | 31,832 1000 USD | -13.3% |
| 1979 | 34,034 1000 USD | +6.9% |
| 1980 | 35,631 1000 USD | +4.7% |
| 1981 | 36,052 1000 USD | +1.2% |
| 1982 | 32,875 1000 USD | -8.8% |
| 1983 | 33,734 1000 USD | +2.6% |
| 1984 | 36,304 1000 USD | +7.6% |
| 1985 | 37,929 1000 USD | +4.5% |
| 1986 | 40,833 1000 USD | +7.7% |
| 1987 | 53,821 1000 USD | +31.8% |
| 1988 | 67,824 1000 USD | +26.0% |
| 1989 | 73,304 1000 USD | +8.1% |
| 1990 | 76,498 1000 USD | +4.4% |
| 1991 | 84,079 1000 USD | +9.9% |
| 1992 | 88,153 1000 USD | +4.8% |
| 1993 | 101,724 1000 USD | +15.4% |
| 1994 | 100,068 1000 USD | -1.6% |
| 1995 | 112,007 1000 USD | +11.9% |
| 1996 | 114,757 1000 USD | +2.5% |
| 1997 | 118,733 1000 USD | +3.5% |
| 1998 | 109,716 1000 USD | -7.6% |
| 1999 | 120,831 1000 USD | +10.1% |
| 2000 | 120,458 1000 USD | -0.3% |
| 2001 | 110,338 1000 USD | -8.4% |
| 2002 | 108,765 1000 USD | -1.4% |
| 2003 | 96,905 1000 USD | -10.9% |
| 2004 | 114,096 1000 USD | +17.7% |
| 2005 | 122,916 1000 USD | +7.7% |
| 2006 | 129,296 1000 USD | +5.2% |
| 2007 | 100,053 1000 USD | -22.6% |
| 2008 | 113,738 1000 USD | +13.7% |
| 2009 | 111,300 1000 USD | -2.1% |
| 2010 | 116,610 1000 USD | +4.8% |
| 2011 | 118,723 1000 USD | +1.8% |
| 2012 | 117,374 1000 USD | -1.1% |
| 2013 | 117,092 1000 USD | -0.2% |
| 2014 | 117,236 1000 USD | +0.1% |
| 2015 | 111,326 1000 USD | -5.0% |
| 2016 | 107,100 1000 USD | -3.8% |
| 2017 | 113,187 1000 USD | +5.7% |
| 2018 | 103,455 1000 USD | -8.6% |
| 2019 | 102,461 1000 USD | -1.0% |
| 2020 | 101,276 1000 USD | -1.2% |
| 2021 | 103,780 1000 USD | +2.5% |
| 2022 | 108,259 1000 USD | +4.3% |
| 2023 | 113,349 1000 USD | +4.7% |
| 2024 | 118,835 1000 USD | +4.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 22,456 1000 USD | 17,894 1000 USD | 32,911 1000 USD | 9 |
| 1970s | 32,067 1000 USD | 21,466 1000 USD | 37,535 1000 USD | 10 |
| 1980s | 44,831 1000 USD | 32,875 1000 USD | 73,304 1000 USD | 10 |
| 1990s | 102,657 1000 USD | 76,498 1000 USD | 120,831 1000 USD | 10 |
| 2000s | 112,786 1000 USD | 96,905 1000 USD | 129,296 1000 USD | 10 |
| 2010s | 112,456 1000 USD | 102,461 1000 USD | 118,723 1000 USD | 10 |
| 2020s | 109,100 1000 USD | 101,276 1000 USD | 118,835 1000 USD | 5 |
Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate 7.14 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Production, annual growth rate 3.38 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.3601 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 1.89 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate 2.26 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth 1.06 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate 5.09 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goats — Stocks, annual growth rate 2.71 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 4.33 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Production, annual growth rate 3.62 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) was 118,835 1000 USD in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 129,296 1000 USD in 2006.
- What is the lowest natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was 17,894 1000 USD in 1962.
- How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th out of 14 groups with data for 2024.
- Is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.