Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Philippines
Philippines: Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value was 8.39 million 1000 SLC in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
8.39 million 1000 SLC
Change on year
down 3.8%
World rank
10th
of 19 countries
All-time high
10.42 million 1000 SLC
in 2014
All-time low
85,114 1000 SLC
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Philippines, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 SLC.
Analysis
Philippines recorded 8.39 million 1000 SLC for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in 2024.
That represents a change of down 3.8% on the previous year and down 19.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Philippines peaked at 10.42 million 1000 SLC in 2014 and was at its lowest, 85,114 1000 SLC, in 1961.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Philippines, year by year
| Year | 1000 SLC | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 85,114 1000 SLC | — |
| 1962 | 103,517 1000 SLC | +21.6% |
| 1963 | 119,619 1000 SLC | +15.6% |
| 1964 | 138,068 1000 SLC | +15.4% |
| 1965 | 136,688 1000 SLC | -1.0% |
| 1966 | 146,533 1000 SLC | +7.2% |
| 1967 | 149,800 1000 SLC | +2.2% |
| 1968 | 108,117 1000 SLC | -27.8% |
| 1969 | 140,322 1000 SLC | +29.8% |
| 1970 | 144,923 1000 SLC | +3.3% |
| 1971 | 161,026 1000 SLC | +11.1% |
| 1972 | 165,626 1000 SLC | +2.9% |
| 1973 | 174,828 1000 SLC | +5.6% |
| 1974 | 216,234 1000 SLC | +23.7% |
| 1975 | 345,055 1000 SLC | +59.6% |
| 1976 | 437,070 1000 SLC | +26.7% |
| 1977 | 441,670 1000 SLC | +1.1% |
| 1978 | 414,066 1000 SLC | -6.2% |
| 1979 | 446,271 1000 SLC | +7.8% |
| 1980 | 515,282 1000 SLC | +15.5% |
| 1981 | 547,487 1000 SLC | +6.2% |
| 1982 | 598,095 1000 SLC | +9.2% |
| 1983 | 931,649 1000 SLC | +55.8% |
| 1984 | 996,059 1000 SLC | +6.9% |
| 1985 | 1.01 million 1000 SLC | +1.6% |
| 1986 | 1.11 million 1000 SLC | +9.5% |
| 1987 | 1.12 million 1000 SLC | +0.8% |
| 1988 | 1.19 million 1000 SLC | +6.2% |
| 1989 | 1.30 million 1000 SLC | +9.9% |
| 1990 | 1.41 million 1000 SLC | +7.9% |
| 1991 | 4.16 million 1000 SLC | +195.4% |
| 1992 | 3.97 million 1000 SLC | -4.5% |
| 1993 | 4.02 million 1000 SLC | +1.2% |
| 1994 | 4.11 million 1000 SLC | +2.4% |
| 1995 | 4.18 million 1000 SLC | +1.6% |
| 1996 | 4.43 million 1000 SLC | +6.1% |
| 1997 | 5.09 million 1000 SLC | +14.8% |
| 1998 | 5.12 million 1000 SLC | +0.7% |
| 1999 | 4.94 million 1000 SLC | -3.7% |
| 2000 | 4.98 million 1000 SLC | +0.8% |
| 2001 | 6.07 million 1000 SLC | +22.1% |
| 2002 | 6.16 million 1000 SLC | +1.4% |
| 2003 | 6.30 million 1000 SLC | +2.3% |
| 2004 | 7.16 million 1000 SLC | +13.6% |
| 2005 | 7.26 million 1000 SLC | +1.4% |
| 2006 | 8.09 million 1000 SLC | +11.4% |
| 2007 | 9.30 million 1000 SLC | +14.9% |
| 2008 | 9.46 million 1000 SLC | +1.7% |
| 2009 | 8.99 million 1000 SLC | -4.9% |
| 2010 | 9.09 million 1000 SLC | +1.1% |
| 2011 | 9.79 million 1000 SLC | +7.7% |
| 2012 | 10.19 million 1000 SLC | +4.1% |
| 2013 | 10.23 million 1000 SLC | +0.4% |
| 2014 | 10.42 million 1000 SLC | +1.9% |
| 2015 | 9.16 million 1000 SLC | -12.1% |
| 2016 | 8.34 million 1000 SLC | -8.9% |
| 2017 | 9.36 million 1000 SLC | +12.2% |
| 2018 | 9.74 million 1000 SLC | +4.0% |
| 2019 | 9.93 million 1000 SLC | +2.0% |
| 2020 | 9.72 million 1000 SLC | -2.1% |
| 2021 | 9.91 million 1000 SLC | +1.9% |
| 2022 | 9.56 million 1000 SLC | -3.5% |
| 2023 | 8.71 million 1000 SLC | -8.9% |
| 2024 | 8.39 million 1000 SLC | -3.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 125,309 1000 SLC | 85,114 1000 SLC | 149,800 1000 SLC | 9 |
| 1970s | 294,677 1000 SLC | 144,923 1000 SLC | 446,271 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1980s | 931,879 1000 SLC | 515,282 1000 SLC | 1.30 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.14 million 1000 SLC | 1.41 million 1000 SLC | 5.12 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2000s | 7.38 million 1000 SLC | 4.98 million 1000 SLC | 9.46 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.63 million 1000 SLC | 8.34 million 1000 SLC | 10.42 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2020s | 9.26 million 1000 SLC | 8.39 million 1000 SLC | 9.91 million 1000 SLC | 5 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
More agriculture & rural data for Philippines
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -0.2488 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0859 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 358.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.0874 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4423 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 8.59 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 8.59 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.6% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Philippines?
- Natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Philippines was 8.39 million 1000 SLC in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 10.42 million 1000 SLC in 2014.
- What is the lowest natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was 85,114 1000 SLC in 1961.
- How does Philippines rank for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value?
- Philippines ranks 10th out of 19 countries with data for 2024.
- Is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value rising or falling in Philippines?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.