Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Malaysia
Malaysia: Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value was 485,799 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▼ Falling
Latest (2024)
485,799 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 11.1%
World rank
7th
of 31 countries
All-time high
2.09 million 1000 Int$
in 1988
All-time low
437,269 1000 Int$
in 2023
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Malaysia, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Malaysia recorded 485,799 1000 Int$ for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in 2024.
The figure is up 11.1% on the previous year and down 42.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Malaysia peaked at 2.09 million 1000 Int$ in 1988 and was at its lowest, 437,269 1000 Int$, in 2023.
Malaysia ranks 7th of 31 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Malaysia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 992,532 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 997,411 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 1963 | 1.04 million 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 1964 | 1.09 million 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1965 | 1.15 million 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1966 | 1.22 million 1000 Int$ | +6.1% |
| 1967 | 1.24 million 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1968 | 1.38 million 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 1969 | 1.59 million 1000 Int$ | +15.2% |
| 1970 | 1.60 million 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1971 | 1.66 million 1000 Int$ | +3.9% |
| 1972 | 1.64 million 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 1973 | 1.94 million 1000 Int$ | +18.3% |
| 1974 | 1.92 million 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 1975 | 1.83 million 1000 Int$ | -4.3% |
| 1976 | 2.03 million 1000 Int$ | +10.5% |
| 1977 | 2.00 million 1000 Int$ | -1.5% |
| 1978 | 1.99 million 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 1979 | 1.97 million 1000 Int$ | -0.8% |
| 1980 | 1.92 million 1000 Int$ | -2.6% |
| 1981 | 1.90 million 1000 Int$ | -1.3% |
| 1982 | 1.88 million 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 1983 | 1.97 million 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 1984 | 1.92 million 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 1985 | 1.85 million 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 1986 | 1.93 million 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 1987 | 1.98 million 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1988 | 2.09 million 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1989 | 1.78 million 1000 Int$ | -14.8% |
| 1990 | 1.62 million 1000 Int$ | -8.7% |
| 1991 | 1.58 million 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 1992 | 1.47 million 1000 Int$ | -6.7% |
| 1993 | 1.35 million 1000 Int$ | -8.4% |
| 1994 | 1.38 million 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1995 | 1.37 million 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 1996 | 1.36 million 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 1997 | 1.22 million 1000 Int$ | -10.3% |
| 1998 | 1.11 million 1000 Int$ | -8.8% |
| 1999 | 966,415 1000 Int$ | -13.2% |
| 2000 | 1.17 million 1000 Int$ | +20.6% |
| 2001 | 1.11 million 1000 Int$ | -4.9% |
| 2002 | 1.12 million 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 2003 | 1.24 million 1000 Int$ | +10.8% |
| 2004 | 1.47 million 1000 Int$ | +18.6% |
| 2005 | 1.42 million 1000 Int$ | -3.7% |
| 2006 | 1.61 million 1000 Int$ | +14.0% |
| 2007 | 1.51 million 1000 Int$ | -6.5% |
| 2008 | 1.35 million 1000 Int$ | -10.6% |
| 2009 | 1.08 million 1000 Int$ | -20.1% |
| 2010 | 1.18 million 1000 Int$ | +9.6% |
| 2011 | 1.25 million 1000 Int$ | +6.1% |
| 2012 | 1.16 million 1000 Int$ | -7.4% |
| 2013 | 1.04 million 1000 Int$ | -10.5% |
| 2014 | 840,366 1000 Int$ | -19.1% |
| 2015 | 907,621 1000 Int$ | +8.0% |
| 2016 | 846,525 1000 Int$ | -6.7% |
| 2017 | 930,265 1000 Int$ | +9.9% |
| 2018 | 758,312 1000 Int$ | -18.5% |
| 2019 | 804,189 1000 Int$ | +6.0% |
| 2020 | 646,919 1000 Int$ | -19.6% |
| 2021 | 590,318 1000 Int$ | -8.7% |
| 2022 | 473,903 1000 Int$ | -19.7% |
| 2023 | 437,269 1000 Int$ | -7.7% |
| 2024 | 485,799 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.19 million 1000 Int$ | 992,532 1000 Int$ | 1.59 million 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.86 million 1000 Int$ | 1.60 million 1000 Int$ | 2.03 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.92 million 1000 Int$ | 1.78 million 1000 Int$ | 2.09 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.34 million 1000 Int$ | 966,415 1000 Int$ | 1.62 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.31 million 1000 Int$ | 1.08 million 1000 Int$ | 1.61 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 971,892 1000 Int$ | 758,312 1000 Int$ | 1.25 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 526,842 1000 Int$ | 437,269 1000 Int$ | 646,919 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Malaysia
More agriculture & rural data for Malaysia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 13.04 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0822 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,078 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.913 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2261 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 8.22 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 8.22 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Malaysia?
- Natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Malaysia was 485,799 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value recorded in Malaysia?
- The highest recorded value was 2.09 million 1000 Int$ in 1988.
- What is the lowest natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value recorded in Malaysia?
- The lowest recorded value was 437,269 1000 Int$ in 2023.
- How does Malaysia rank for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value?
- Malaysia ranks 7th out of 31 countries with data for 2024.
- Is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value rising or falling in Malaysia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 42.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Malaysia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.